Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hydroxy hell: The deadly attack on a long-proven COVID treatment
WND ^ | 06/21/2021 | Joel S. Hirschhorn

Posted on 06/21/2021 6:23:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2021 6:23:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

…and in Australia more have died from the vaccine than from the virus, this year.


2 posted on 06/21/2021 6:29:31 PM PDT by smoky415
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Fauxci is a political stooge for the Left.
3 posted on 06/21/2021 6:30:00 PM PDT by immadashell (New Planned Parenthood slogan: Black Babies’ Lives Don't Matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: immadashell
RE: Fauxci is a political stooge for the Left.

In 2005, Fauci actually pushed HCQ as a treatment for all types of coronaviruses. It was reported that he was a strong proponent of HCQ, because it worked against SARS, a cousin of the current SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19. He admitted that HCQ "completely abolished SARS-CoV infection."
4 posted on 06/21/2021 6:36:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dr Fauci should be in jail...


5 posted on 06/21/2021 6:44:05 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bkmk


6 posted on 06/21/2021 6:44:42 PM PDT by sauropod (The smartphone is the retina of the mind's eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Dr. Fauci should be in a gibbet.


7 posted on 06/21/2021 6:57:39 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Come on Man, there is NO MONEY to be made foe a dirt cheap off patent drug with no side effects that is safer than tylenol


8 posted on 06/21/2021 6:58:28 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoky415

Scary.

That may be the case in even more countries, this year.


9 posted on 06/21/2021 6:59:29 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Come on Man, there is NO MONEY to be made foe a dirt cheap off patent drug with no side effects that is safer than tylenol


Yep. If sheeple can’t figure BigPharma’s (who owns hospital systems -> who own docs) obvious goal...w/this ScamDEMic and rushed, experimental and risky shots, then they are truly blind.


10 posted on 06/21/2021 7:08:05 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
HCQ used as a early treatment for Covid infection is a good use. However, there have been 3,888,357 deaths world wide from Covid. If every one of them received HCQ treatment, that would have been quite a demand for it. Right now, HCQ costs $66 for 60 tablets (200mg) at Costco. If there was a huge demand world wide for HCQ, that cost would go through the roof. How much would it cost if all 3,888,357 were treated with HCQ? How many of the 179,534,629 world wide cases, even if they didn't die, would have been treated early on with HCQ? I can imagine the demand for HCQ would have been like the toilet paper wiped off the shelves as fast as it was supplied.

Then, the use of HCQ used as a preventative instead of a vaccine is another matter to consider. How much would HCQ cost if every one in the world took one 200 mg tablet each day?

Here is the year supply for the world's population (7.7 billion) taking one tablet per day:

2,810,500,000,000 tablets or 46,841,666,666 60 tablet bottles.

How much would those 60 tablet bottles cost at Costco?

$3,091,549,999,956


11 posted on 06/21/2021 7:20:58 PM PDT by jonrick46 ( Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I guess it is a good thing this has gone main stream, but a lot of us have known these facts for a long long time.


12 posted on 06/21/2021 7:23:24 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“… compelling real-world data starting in March 2020 that cheap, safe and FDA-approved hydroxychloroquine really worked …”

Yeah, but if you have one or more existing, effective treatments, then you can’t emergency authorize experimental drugs for mass distribution and use, right?

13 posted on 06/21/2021 7:24:02 PM PDT by GBA (Endeavor to persevere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GBA
... if you have one or more existing, effective treatments, then you can’t emergency authorize experimental drugs

We heard that all the time. It strikes me as a red herring excuse because the feds could have easily relaxed or suspended that prohibition against EUA if there was a therapeutic treatment available. It's a man-made regulation that might make sense in non-pandemic times. But a man-made reg could be easily undone for a year or two specifically for COVID. Why was there no effort or political will to do that?

14 posted on 06/21/2021 8:27:50 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("Pour les vaincre il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

And a lot of others.


15 posted on 06/21/2021 8:34:02 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Welcome to the Matrix circa 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Some on here trust the government 100%, If they were told they needed to jump off a bridge after the shot, they would.


16 posted on 06/21/2021 8:52:28 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
It strikes me as a red herring excuse because the feds could have easily relaxed or suspended that prohibition against EUA if there was a therapeutic treatment available.

The optics would have been very bad for them.

First, they'd have to admit to an existing treatment, or face questions about why they are removing a restriction that doesn't apply.

Then they would have to address requests for the existing treatment over the experimental new vaccines.

It was in their best interests to keep the regulation as it was and just kill the hopes of using HCQ, even if they had to flip-flop and go against longstanding prior opinions on the matter.

-PJ

17 posted on 06/21/2021 9:08:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

So saving face was more important to them than saving lives. It’s too bad Trump couldn’t have cut through that BS


18 posted on 06/21/2021 9:14:44 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("Pour les vaincre il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Why was there no effort or political will to do that?

“Ch-Ching!” And suddenly I hear The O’Jays singing For The Love of Money in my head … “Money, money, money, money …. Money!”

And, of course, Power!

Because, while some got very rich, some lost power and some retained power and some regained power!

And, because not having readily available, cheap and well understood APPROVED drugs and protocols was essential for not letting this crisis go to waste, so they made the most of it?

That is my observation. How about you? Or did I misunderstand your question?

My question is: how many politicians and judges would you need to run America?

My best guess is that someone knows this answer and their collection has become more than adequate to do this … which would explain a great deal that doesn’t make sense any other way.

How about you?

19 posted on 06/21/2021 9:21:34 PM PDT by GBA (Endeavor to persevere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GBA
"essential for not letting this crisis go to waste"

The pandemic was the key to stealing the election, so they would do anything humanly possible to keep HCQ and Ivermectin unavailable.

See Sometimes a Coincidence isn’t a Coincidence for an explanation of how it did't go to waste. They used this crisis to achieve a far bigger result than any crisis in human history.

20 posted on 06/21/2021 9:26:51 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("Pour les vaincre il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson