Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ProtectOurFreedom
It strikes me as a red herring excuse because the feds could have easily relaxed or suspended that prohibition against EUA if there was a therapeutic treatment available.

The optics would have been very bad for them.

First, they'd have to admit to an existing treatment, or face questions about why they are removing a restriction that doesn't apply.

Then they would have to address requests for the existing treatment over the experimental new vaccines.

It was in their best interests to keep the regulation as it was and just kill the hopes of using HCQ, even if they had to flip-flop and go against longstanding prior opinions on the matter.

-PJ

17 posted on 06/21/2021 9:08:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

So saving face was more important to them than saving lives. It’s too bad Trump couldn’t have cut through that BS


18 posted on 06/21/2021 9:14:44 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("Pour les vaincre il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson