To: SeekAndFind
“… compelling real-world data starting in March 2020 that cheap, safe and FDA-approved hydroxychloroquine really worked …” Yeah, but if you have one or more existing, effective treatments, then you can’t emergency authorize experimental drugs for mass distribution and use, right?
13 posted on
06/21/2021 7:24:02 PM PDT by
GBA
(Endeavor to persevere)
To: GBA
... if you have one or more existing, effective treatments, then you can’t emergency authorize experimental drugsWe heard that all the time. It strikes me as a red herring excuse because the feds could have easily relaxed or suspended that prohibition against EUA if there was a therapeutic treatment available. It's a man-made regulation that might make sense in non-pandemic times. But a man-made reg could be easily undone for a year or two specifically for COVID. Why was there no effort or political will to do that?
14 posted on
06/21/2021 8:27:50 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
("Pour les vaincre il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace")
To: GBA
** Yeah, but if you have one or more existing, effective treatments, then you can’t emergency authorize experimental drugs for mass distribution and use, right? **
plus you'd have to figure out another way to cull the herd...
31 posted on
06/23/2021 8:00:05 AM PDT by
stylin19a
(I have kleptomania, but when it gets real bad, I take something for it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson