Posted on 06/21/2021 4:32:48 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
So because there have been conspiracies over the last 5 years, Dr. Carrie Madej's fevered rantings are not a conspiracy? That's flawed logic.
Lots of technology has been created in the last couple of decades that the majority know nothing about.
So because there's new technology, Dr. Carrie Madej's fantastical rantings about lipid nanoparticles that read your mind are real? Again, that's flawed logic.
Watch the original video (she knows more now), or watch these 2 videos
I don't waste my time watching videos by barking moonbats. Besides, that would just increase their hit counts, and I'm not going to contribute to that.
—I don’t waste my time watching videos by barking moonbats.—
You haven’t added any arguments or evidence to the conservation. Only name calling.
If you want to learn about lipid nano-particles and their potential use as bio sensors, there is plenty you can read. Here are some scientific papers:
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/10/9/120/htm
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316677/
As far as I can ascertain, everything Dr. Madej said in the video was accurate.
Never thought it that way.........
I got parts...
I already said that heh. Many don’t. They’ll just cower and do as they’re told, and not question anything and act like they’re doing the right thing because they follow the path of least resistance.
Lipid nano-particles can't read your mind. If you believe that statement from Dr. Madej, then you have lost your ability to reason. Any person who says that has zero credibility.
What logic are using to determine that Dr. Carrie Madej is employing fevered rantings? In fact, her delivery is not one of a fevered ranting at all, but actually a calm but firm warning. Your statement there tells me you did not watch the video at all, but made a rush to judgement, based solely on my quickly assembled words to give people an idea of what the video is about.
I don't waste my time watching videos by barking moonbats.
Again, you are not employing any logic whatsoever. What you are employing is your bias that you know more than this doctor, while knowing nothing about her or her credentials. Seems to me, that you may be the moonbat, but since I don't know you so I won't proclaim you to be one. But one thing I can tell is that you are shortsighted and are deathly afraid of examination for yourself, something that differs from what you perceive is the truth. That is not how one grows their knowledge base, and that statement validates my previous postulation that you did not see the video at all.
How many people that probably both you and I dismissed because we thought the messenger was full of BS, only to learn now that we were the ones who had our eyes closed to the realities we were refusing to even investigate more because we thought we knew better.
Technological advances have exploded in the last 2 decades, and many of them we don't even know about. So what you perceive as an impossibility, may be so far advanced as to be perceived as nonsense. What we may think and what the reality is may be polar opposites.
Perhaps you might learn something from the link:
Nanobots ‡ la Michael Crichton's Prey and other science fiction contraptions of nanoscale robots don't exist (yet). Or perhaps that we actually know of. (my words)
Not to be confused with these fictional nanorobots, for medical nanotechnology researchers a nanorobot, or nanobot, is a popular term for molecules with a unique property that enables them to be programmed to carry out a specific task.
These nanobots are a reality and are being actively researched and developed.
An ever-increasing number of research groups are exploiting programmable self-assembly properties of nucleic acids in creating rationally designed nanoshapes and nanomachines for many different uses. That's why one of the most actively researched areas of nanorobotics today involves DNA assembly, particularly a technique called DNA origami (see link for more details).
And when the FEAR began to fail, they used bribes and prizes to keep ‘em coming in for that vaxx.
What you said is true. But many took the vax because they are used to taking the vax, while others, like myself, never take a vax. I just rely on my immune system, and if it fails me, then I guess it's my time. I don't fear dying nearly as much as I fear a vax having an adverse reaction on me and being left alive to deal with those adverse reactions. 8>)
But keep in mind that President Trump was not really about the vaccine as much as he was about freeing the American public from the tyrannical response by Democrats to the fake pandemic, and constantly promoted by the mainstream press.
I think all that has happened after this one got loose, possibly accidentally, was then purposefully allowed to happen without much initial warning.
And the natural fear that followed was purposefully amplified and then used to the fullest politically here and around the world.
Usually, in normal times, there would be the usual flu shots offered in all the usual locations and, as you point out, a great many who normally get a flu shot were the first to get vaxxed this time.
Latent trust in the things around us is normal and we rely on this to get through a day without thinking too much, as most are too overwhelmed by life as it is.
Like you, I trust what God has given us with our natural immunity and, given the numbers, I know that most are not in the high risk category and that our natural immunity is both sufficient and easily enhanced with good food, rest and supplements.
Natural imunity to other people’s fear, however, has been a bit trickier to acquire.
Fortunately, God helps us with this immunity, too. No worries!
Oh please. What a pathetically weak argument to make.
It’s the kind of argument that one makes when they don’t want there to be differing viewpoints and only want the viewpoint that THEY are presenting to be accepted.
It’s still going to be a recognizable mark..in the right hand or forehead. They don’t give vaccines in the forhead or in the right hand.
Yes the Bible has symbolism but one needs to recognize when it is telling one the literal facts...good, cold, and hard.
Now this is not to say that such marks won’t have elements of nano-tech in them that prep vaccines could be used to prime one for slavery to the beast. Yet there will be a visible mark and if one takes it in the right hand and fore-head, then they are doomed forever to never have eternal life with God.
2/3rds of Israel’s Jews are supposed to die during the final 3.5 years of the tribulation. Nearly 100 percent of Israelis(including its Arabs) are currently vaccinated. So if there are no mass die off from the vaccines in Israel within a year or two...perhaps that will tamp down the vaccines will kill everyone spiel. I think the vaccine tech is crude and was rushed and some unfortunates may have been crippled or killed because of that crude tech.
She makes references to Agenda 2030, which calls for development strategies that result in resilient societies where people are safe from chronic threats such as abject poverty, hunger, disease, violence and repression, and protected from sudden and hurtful disruptions in their daily lives. The U.N. put this out in 2017: HOW AFRICA CAN ACHIEVE THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS. Have we heard or seen anything positive now 4 years later?
Nanobots Will Be Flowing Through Your Body by 2030
In 10 years, nanobots in your blood might keep you from getting sick or even transmit your thoughts to a wireless cloud.
Who knows how advanced they are or of they already have the technology? But that is a stated goal. Since Bill Gates and the U.N. are constantly talking about reducing the population, I doubt their true agenda is what they claim it to be, for the betterment of mankind.
Whether or not if they can actually read your mind, they most likely will be able to see what you see, and hear what you say. So, if a person says out loud that they feel like kill this person, do they really need to have the capability of actually reading minds?
How she may have actually stated it, I no longer remember. But this person is not a wacko nutcase by any shape, form, or fashion.
But this is exactly why I hate to try and create summaries, but I did so in an attempt to get people to watch what she has to say. Because there is always the ones like you that refuse to take a look at it because of how I might have worded a sentence.
So you're making up lies to scare people into watching a video by a person who talks about lipid nanoparticles but doesn't say what you said they say.
You should realize how compromised that makes you. You're scaring people and inducing paranoia. No one should listen to you on this subject because you just proved by your own words that you have no credibility.
Besides, if there were actually nanobots in the lipid nanoparticles, we'd know about it by now. That would be the story of the century. For you to toss around ideas like that (that the COVID vaccine has nanobots in the lipid nanoparticles that will transmit your words to the government - LOL!) with absolutely no proof shows what an illogical person you are.
But apparently I did a poor job of trying to summarize what I had heard over the previous 22 minutes. I wasn't trying to scare anyone. I was trying to inform people.
But hey, I could really careless what you want, or don't want, to do.
Enjoy your socialist hell hole in Californication.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.