Yes, I’ve read about reverse transcriptase in viruses elsewhere, but the reference article asserts that the spike protein is created “through DNA alteration by the RNA load”. Whether or not the mRNA manages to insinuate itself into the cell nucleus, as you’re suggesting, that isn’t its primary role in the cell. If some enzyme other than the spike protein is also part of, or created by one of the vaccines, please enlighten me.
It seems to me that the burden of proof is on those who assert that it’s doing nasty business in the DNA. “Can” doesn’t mean “must”. It also doesn’t mean “usually”, or even “in this particular case”.
Yes, I’ve read about reverse transcriptase in viruses elsewhere, but the reference article asserts that the spike protein is created “through DNA alteration by the RNA load”. Whether or not the mRNA manages to insinuate itself into the cell nucleus, as you’re suggesting, that isn’t its primary role in the cell. If some enzyme other than the spike protein is also part of, or created by one of the vaccines, please enlighten me.
It seems to me that the burden of proof is on those who assert that it’s doing nasty business in the DNA. “Can” doesn’t mean “must”. It also doesn’t mean “usually”, or even “in this particular case”.
*******************************************************************************
I certainly did not say that it was doing anything nasty, or usually or even a PARTICULAR case.
You made a statement: “That mechanism bypasses the cell’s DNA; it doesn’t alter it.”
I gave you an authoritative link on science that seems to challenge that view. It also indicates a very real opportunity for repairing genetic problems. Which could be a good thing:
“Now, Thomas Jefferson University researchers provide the first evidence that RNA segments can be written back into DNA, which potentially challenges the central dogma in biology and could have wide implications affecting many fields of biology.
The reality that a human polymerase can do this with high efficiency, raises many questions.” For example, this finding suggests that RNA messages can be used as templates for repairing or re-writing genomic DNA.”
I don’t really think that there’s any need to try to enlighten you. Apparently your mind is made up. I’m sure that these researchers will continue their research. And you are of course, free do whatever.
Shrug. Frankly I could care less.
Sorry I misjudged you- I thought you might be interested in this study/science. Twasn’t meant as a challenge, argument, or put-down.
It’s of no further interest to me at this point.
Have a good night.
Nuff said.