Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe

Your analysis is incorrect. It was never expected to be more than 95% effective at eliminating the disease. It WAS expected, though, of reducing the severity of the disease in all who received it.


8 posted on 06/20/2021 3:55:05 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: norwaypinesavage

Yes but healthy athletes in their 20s and early 30/s have a stupidly low risk from the virus itself anyway so it’s in no way proof


15 posted on 06/20/2021 4:03:32 AM PDT by rb22982 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: norwaypinesavage
This article is based on a stupid claim that not only doesn’t stand up to scrutiny, but can’t even be tested.

The article says the vaccine “worked” because most of the infected team personnel had no symptoms, and none of them was hospitalized. There’s no way in hell the moron who wrote the article — or the quack doctor quoted in it — can know with any degree of certainty that the symptoms would have been more serious if they HADN’T been vaccinated.

The first major pro athlete to get COVID was that NBA clown who contracted it after he ran around licking microphones at a press conference in early 2020. His symptoms were mild and he wasn’t hospitalized. Using the logic presented by the dopes who peddled this silly article, that must mean that being a tall black athletic dude is the same as getting a vaccine.

26 posted on 06/20/2021 5:41:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson