You have talked to me before, and it seemed to me then you were agenda driven to make sure people perceive the covid vaccines are safe and effective. We disagreed about how long it takes to develop a vaccine and demonstrate that it is safe and effective. At the time you were arguing with many people taking the same side. Looking at your comment history I see copious posts still arguing the same side. I did not notice a comment on any other issue, but of course there are so very many comments on this issue they may be obscured. So that is why I asked. For myself I am not a biologist, though my wife is and has worked as a research scientist on flu vaccines for many years. She takes a much more skeptical view of the safety of these vaccines than you and she disagreed with many of your assertions as just wrong. Should I write her off as a kook perhaps and put my trust in your sources alone? Should I ignore the fact that you seem to be on a mission?
Not at all. I would encourage you to do your own research at reputable sites if you wish to fully understand the topics at hand. I'm always happy to provide suggested starting points for topics that are unclear, whether it's about how mRNA works, how ribosomes work, how dendritic cells and lymphocytes work, or whatever else. Generally people who understand the underlying biology well will agree with what I have to say (not to say that's universally true, but it typically is). My first suggestion to anyone really looking to get at the truth is to research and understand what's going on under the hood - so to speak. Understanding the base processes (outside the context of COVID or mRNA vaccines) makes it a whole lot easier to understand whether something is likely truth or fiction.
In any event, regardless of whether we agree or not, you seem interested in keeping the discussion civil and I have to say I really appreciate that. Even if we never agree about the vaccines, we can choose to have disagreements cordially.