Posted on 06/14/2021 11:42:22 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
What I find amazing is that a judge can rule Houston Hospital workers have to take an emergency use vaccine on one hand, then we read about people dying from Covid after the vaccine. Point being, our policy is as consistent and based on science as an every other day Fauci flip flop.
This was Fraud Fauci's recommendation.
1. Get tested, stay at home.
2. If you get sicker, come to the ER/ICU
By NOT recomending early treatments like HCQ or ivermectin, Fauci assured maximum havoc/maximum deaths.
I ignored Fauci when I was infected last year. The two of us went to one of these FRONTLINE DOCTORS and took HCQ+Zn+antibiotic. They have now added ivermectin to day one of the drug treatment. There is also listed a preventative treatment using OTC supplements.
Fauci withheld treatment information for two reasons:
1. BIG PHARMA MADE $BILLIONS
2. DimWITS got vote by mail
ARTICLE Doctors list treatment for C-19 and preventative for C-19 using OTC supplements
Fauci and his co-conspirators are guilty of murder because they withheld treatments that are nearly 100% effective if given w/in first FIVE days of symptoms.
Your neighbor died because Fauci lied.
Most of the people I associate with don't believe anything on your list. I think the plan by the patriots is to expose each of the lies on your list and show the public the correct answers.
Sure, some of the idiots in the public will continue to hold on to their masks and social distancing. But when the states begin to de-certify the election results, more and more people will join us for the DimWIT BBQ that is planned for later in the summer.
The DImWITS have decided their best defense is to attack the audits. That is going to be a big loosing plan IMHO.
1malumprohibitum wrote: “Seriously? HCQ has been in constant use for DECADES. We know everything there is to know about it. It is absolutely safe for just about everyone. You cannot even compare an experimental gene therapy to that. It’s ridiculous”
It is hypocritical to criticize the vaccines for not being approved without also criticizing HCQ for not being approved.
FWIW:
Hydroxychloroquine is associated with several rare but serious adverse reactions that may warrant immediate discontinuation of the medicine.
Serious adverse reactions include ophthalmological, cardiomyopathy and QT prolongation, haematological, and neurological and neuromuscular reactions.
Nor, has HCQ been shown to be effective in treating COVID. At one time there was an EUA for HCQ for COVID but that was withdrawn.
15 Jun 2020. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revoked the emergency use authorization (EUA) that allowed for chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate donated to the Strategic National Stockpile to be used to treat certain hospitalized patients with COVID-19 when a clinical trial was unavailable, or participation in a clinical trial was not feasible. The agency determined that the legal criteria for issuing an EUA are no longer met. Based on its ongoing analysis of the EUA and emerging scientific data, the FDA determined that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are unlikely to be effective in treating COVID-19 for the authorized uses in the EUA. Additionally, in light of ongoing serious cardiac adverse events and other potential serious side effects, the known and potential benefits of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine no longer outweigh the known and potential risks for the authorized use. This is the statutory standard for issuance of an EUA. The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services originally requested the EUA covering chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, and the FDA granted the EUA on March 28, 2020 based on the science and data available at the time. Today, in consultation with the FDA, BARDA sent a letter to the FDA requesting revocation of the EUA based on up to date science and data.
All I can say Fish is there is a whole lot of exaggeration going on about Covid, Covid cures, vaccinations and a ton of other things that are extremely hard—or easy—to prove, one way or the other.
Discernment is required, not only for the things people say, but also the data they attempt to prove it with.
This is why the media has been so keen on telling us how many people came down with Covid, BUT NOT how many died, or how many got it and survived. The survival rate (got covid/recovered) is an extremely easy number to find, but I rarely saw it on any mainstream press outlet.
When they don’t tell you how many survived it versus died, there’s probably an agenda.
Same with vaccine rate versus those who got Covid after, or even died after getting the vaccine. In both cases, those numbers are out there.
When they tell you that 8 or 10 or 1000 or even 10,000 died after getting the shot, but not how many actually got the shot, you know there’s an agenda there, too.
And some people say they’ve done a ton of research, which means they watched Youtube video after Youtube video, and read hundreds of web sites, all with the same bias that the researcher is trying to prove.
And then there are those who say it doesn’t show data today, but, Aha! in three or four years people will be dying in droves.
Yeah, especially the elderly who got the vaccine at a much higher percentage than younger people. They’ll all be dying, mind you, because they’ve reach their end of live factors.
Oh, also meant to say...
From the article title!
CDC says 8 Mainers have died with COVID-19 after being fully vaccinated
From 1 in 1000 to 1 in 1 million depending on how effective the vaccine they took was supposed to be. (90% to 99%)
The arguments about its risk were generated once President Trump talked about the drug.
What can I say?
Great post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.