The judge did a great job in this case of distinguishing between government-imposed measures and those imposed by a private employer. That nuance is absolutely critical, and the elimination of that distinction between public and private interests in the application of “civil rights” laws has been one of the most destructive things to happen in this country in recent decades.
Let me ask you a simple question: Does this judge sound like one who would uphold a verdict against a Christian business owner who refuses to bake a cake for a homosexual “wedding?”
Baking a cake or not is trivial compared to forcing people to accept an experimental synthetic Messenger RNA injection approved under an emergency use authorization.
You can’t unjab yourself.