There is no “coercion” involved. You CHOOSE to take a job. You CHOOSE to quit. No one forces you to work a given job. If you have the right to quit, then what you decide is WHAT YOU DECIDE!
There is no “coercion” involved. You CHOOSE to take a job. You CHOOSE to quit. No one forces you to work a given job. If you have the right to quit, then what you decide is WHAT YOU DECIDE!
Only Houston Methodist is one of THE top systems to work for, in Houston, unfortunately.
This requirement is quite telling about this Pharma-owned system, though. I’d run away from them as fast as possible, personally.
I guess, by your standard, freedom loving Houston healthcare workers could quit these jobs and work for lower level hospitals, with pay and benefit cuts, right?
“There is no “coercion” involved. You CHOOSE to take a job. You CHOOSE to quit. No one forces you to work a given job. If you have the right to quit, then what you decide is WHAT YOU DECIDE!”
That’s some authentic frontier gibberish right there.
First thing, not that it should matter, but I’d point out in this instance they already have the job.
Right now they are being pressured to take an experimental vaccine or else they will get fired.
You know damn well that’s coercion. What’s important to understand here, is apparently you think that’s OK.
It is illegal under federal law to require anyone to take part in clinical trials, accept an experimental drug or vaccine, and it is illegal to use coercion as a means of compliance.
Is it your contention that employers can “choose” to break federal law here?
Almost like when they wrote these laws they anticipated this exact sort of abuse. Almost. Weird, huh?