[enumerated]

What’s the point of regurgitating Yankee propaganda now? They already won and got to record their version of history. :-)

[the OlLine Rebel]

Heh heh heh

Esp. Seeing what’s happening now.

[BroJoeK]

enumerated: "What’s the point of regurgitating Yankee propaganda now?
They already won and got to record their version of history. :-)"

You say the Yankees won, but that's only in the history books.
On Free Republic the North didn't win, can never win, because the war's not over and the South has risen again to claim its victories! ;-)

So I invite you to read the entire piece:

"Editorial: Hatred to the South – 6-7"

It addresses something often claimed on these threads and says, in part:

"Among the falsehoods industriously circulated by the rebel leaders and the rebel Press, to delude and stimulate their followers, is what they are pleased to term the 'hatred of the South' on the part of the people of the loyal States, as if the war was being prosecuted to satisfy popular malignity against brethren of the same nationality and kindred of the same race.
There never was a greater fallacy, a more wicked perversion, than this.
That the people of the Northern States hate the treason of the South, and would not hesitate to punish the unprincipled leaders who have fomented it into rebellion, is entirely true.
This is inevitable, growing out of and is the converse of their love for the Union against which that treason is in revolt; but there is not, and never has been, in the Northern minds, any such passion as hatred to the South.

The history of the past proves this, and the instincts of every true heart attest it.
The North has always been in the majority, and yet the honors and emoluments of official place have been enjoyed by the South to an extent greatly beyond their numerical proportion..."

The editorial goes on to review the history of Southern control over Washington, DC, the acquiescence of Northerners to Southern political demands, and their toleration of Confederate seizures of Federal properties.
It ends with this:

"...The people of the South are regarded as our brethren, deluded, deceived, betrayed, plundered of their freedom of inquiry, of speech and of action; forced into opposition to the Consitution and treason to the Union against their instincts, their sober judgment and free volition, by bold, ban men.
What is asked of them is to break away from their wicked and fatal leaderships and return to their allegiance to the Constitution; to take their place again among the States of the Union, place back the now veiled stars in their brightness in the banner of the Republic, and they will find a warm place in the Northern heart.
They will encounter no animosities, be harmed by no malice.
They will find this "hatred of the South" an idle phantom.
They will discover that kindness and not hatred, fraternal feeling and not malignity towards them will pervade, as they always have the Northern heart.

But the loyal army will march to the Gulf, if that be necessary to save the Union.
It will march there not in hatred of the South, but to save the South even from itself.
Its progress may be slow, and reverses may be encountered, but when a soldier falls two will take his place, and it will march to the Gulf."

Such views today are more often mocked & disparaged than openly expressed, but I think they were genuine at the time, and some of that remains even today.

As it happens, one of my great grandfathers did, literally, march to the Gulf, where he was wounded in battle and nearly died from the infection, at the war's very end.