Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Freedom56v2

Well, you know its the year 2021, you could have a crush (I was just responding to the attack about her rejecting me for a date — but fair enough).

Her group has made numerous fringe statements — see AFLD website and compare with other literature, it is a large task to fully document all of her fringe theories and statements.

With all due and sincere respect, you are asking me to redevelop all the pro and contra arguments of the use of HCQ, which is been debated ad nauseam on this forum. Please feel free to look at my posting history — I try (despite certain stalkers) to remain objective in the medical analysis. As for my credentials, I am a critical care anesthesiologist in a large hospital system but being threatened to be doxxed and generally attacked by two particular stalkers one of whom hypocritically sites her faith with viscerally attacking me, I am not incline to say much more for my security.

I stand on what I have said and shared over the course of caring for those critically ill with CoVID over the last 18 months or so.

I wish you all the best as well


53 posted on 06/04/2021 6:51:55 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr
I sent you this yesterday:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.28.21258012v1

Introduction This observational study looked at 255 COVID19 patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the first two months of the US pandemic. Through comprehensive, longitudinal evaluation and new consideration of all the data, we were able to better describe and understand factors affecting outcome after intubation.

(snip)

Results By discharge or Day 90, 78.2% of the cohort expired. The most common pre-existing conditions were hypertension, (63.5%), diabetes (59.2%) and obesity (50.4%). Age correlated with death. Comorbidities and clinical status on presentation were not predictive of outcome. Admission markers of inflammation were universally elevated (>96%). The cohort’s weight range was nearly 7-fold. Causal modeling establishes that weight-adjusted HCQ and AZM therapy improves survival by over 100%. QTc prolongation did not correlate with cumulative HCQ dose or HCQ serum levels.

Are you going to deny it to your patients?

69 posted on 06/04/2021 9:25:29 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

Her group has made numerous fringe statements —
see AFLD website and compare with other literature,...
it is a large task to fully document all of her fringe theories and statements.////

From what I can see the AFLD website has been taken down by by the cancellists.

As for the other “fringe theories”these seem to apply to her conviction that HCQ works. Thousands of independent observations documented by frontline physicians confirm this.

If you have a problem with something the MD is saying debate the science. Don’t hand us some crap about critics (with an agenda?) or some rectal exam minutia in an attempt to discredit the entire story. Because after a year of hearing politicized crap about covid guys like you do not impress me.

If you profess to practice the art and science of medicine tell what you believe, why you believe it, and give evidence. Otherwise to me you’re just a valve twister.


80 posted on 06/04/2021 11:21:16 PM PDT by Ceebass (USA RIP 1776-2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson