For the longest time, I really thought the only way they likely cheated was by printing phony, counterfeit ballots and stuffing the boxes just like the good old days.
Now, I’m not so sure. I think counterfeit ballots were used to varying degrees. But, the door has definitely been opened on fudging the tallies, perhaps electronically.
Or perhaps the tallies were ‘massaged’ to account for the phony ballots.
Second opinion needed to prove what Cyber Ninjas found is actually true!!!
Nothing to see here. Never mind the man behind the curtain.
Still want to know how multiple states ALL decided to “stop counting” (and then resume counting) at the same time. Coordination.
Oh, RREEEAAALLLYYYYY???
The key word here is “copies”.
Wait for the media to start trying to make it sound like the original data has been contaminated.
No! It wasn’t. Copies were sent, not the originals.
Weird. These are just copies. Isn't that a bit like worrying about how long a subscriber is going to hang onto the Sunday paper?
If it’s coming from a spokesdunce for Katie Hobbs, you can bet it’s laced with horsesh*t.
Maybe they are attempting a real or a partial audit
Great, now we have to endure the story of an unguarded testing facility in Montana being broken into.
I know it will be hard, but the Republicans will find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They always do.
It was Beth on the Yellowstone Ranch.
I’ve read many bent articles, but the bias in this ne jumps out with every word. Is there anyone left who is so naive that they don’t recognize this as partisan propaganda?
“Another strange twist...” [Uh, what’s strange about sending the data for evaluation by an expert? It’s called an “audit”.]
“remote location in Montana... [Ooooo remote is so scary, must be a White Supremacy HQ...]
“for reasons that aren’t abundantly clear at this point”. [let me guess — cyber experts are going to evaluate the data?]
“sent by controversial contractor CyberNinjas [if media says ‘controversial” enough times it must be true...]
“to the Montana home of a technology company president who accused the county of deleting a voter database. [IOW, to a well-known cybersecurity expert, so he can evaluate the material with his own gear at hand and without travel expenses?]
“...an observer for Katie Hobbs’ office noted that the state Senate audit liaison” [So a partisan Democrat is puffing a story out of nothing?]
“Ken Bennett, confirmed on May 24 that copies of voting system data were sent to a lab in Montana.” [Hmm, so there is nothing secretive about any of this...]
The observer noted that Bennett did not specify what security measures were in place, what the lab in Montana is doing with the data or how long it will have the copies of voting system data. [Oh noes! Smarter people would have spewed the entire security plan so it’s easier to overcome].
“to Cyber Ninjas, the controversial firm that is “auditing” the election records. [So...their style sheet requires coupling “controversial” with every iteration of “Cyber Ninjas” Does “auditing” in quotes mean they aren’t really auditing the election data, but doing something nefarious, like turning the votes into killer Covid viruses in a Chinese lab?]
Most transparent gaslighting ever.
According to a note on the Arizona Secretary of State website, an observer for Katie Hobbs' office noted that the state Senate audit liaison, Ken Bennett, confirmed on May 24 that copies of voting system data were sent to a lab in Montana.
This is coming from the office of the woman is the primary architect of the fraudulent election vote in Arizona and has opposed the audit from the beginning-- plus she just announced she is running for governor. Don't you think that maybe-- just maybe-- any allegations and innuendos by her are total disinformation and propaganda and are worthy of ZERO consideration?