Posted on 05/31/2021 5:39:55 AM PDT by Cathi
TrialSite has learned of material information regarding mRNA vaccine safety revealed by a freedom of information act (FOIA) filed by a group of Canadian physicians (who) have become concerned about COVID-19 mRNA vaccine safety. This new safety information involves the Pfizer mRNA-based vaccine. The FOIA documents reveal animal study results demonstrating Pfizer mRNA-based vaccine does not remain at the injection site, but rather appears to spread widely after injection. According to the documents, pre-clinical studies show the active part of the vaccine (mRNA-lipid nanoparticles), which produce the spike protein, spreads throughout the body and is then concentrated in various organs, including the ovaries and spleen. ...apparently (at least in their European Medicines Agency submission), Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies during vaccines, as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP). The full panel of industry-standard reproductive toxicity and genotoxicity studies were apparently also not performed.
To obtain independent reviews of these EMA regulatory documents, TrialSite contacted both Dr. Robert W. Malone, MD, MS, and another expert that wished to remain anonymous, and provided them copies of the EMA analysis and documents. Dr. Malone was the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology back in the late 1980s. He currently advises several companies in regulatory affairs and clinical development. One of TrialSite’s other sources is a senior regulatory specialist who currently serves as the President of a prestigious European association. When asked to review and comment on the EMA assessment, Dr. Malone noted that normal pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-toxicology studies had not been performed before EUA authorization for the product. “I was particularly surprised that the dossier of regulatory documents indicates allowance for use in humans based on non-GLP PK and Tox studies relying on formulations which are significantly different from the final vaccine."
(Excerpt) Read more at trialsitenews.com ...
To determine the biodistribution of the LNP-formulated modified mRNA (modRNA), the applicant did study distribution of the modRNA in two different non-GLP studies, in mice and rats, and determined the biodistribution of a surrogate luciferase modRNA.
Thus, one might question the validity and applicability of non-GLP studies conducted using a variant of the subject mRNA vaccine.
In addition, no genotoxicity data were provided to EMA.”
the nanomaterials go to human ovaries
and to lymph nodes.
and the animals died.
making Pfizer a lot like, and as dangerous as, FISA.
https://regenerativemc.com/pfizer-animal-trial-results/
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9792931264
Thanks
Bookmark
I am very glad that my husband and I did not cave and get the shots. I was on the fence for a long time....Very glad.
Another anti-vaxxer hoax.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9792931264
Pfizer and Moderna did not skip animal trials
By BEATRICE DUPUY
November 25, 2020
CLAIM: The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are mRNAs vaccines that skipped animal trials because using mRNA vaccines on animals triggers dangerous inflammation.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. Pfizer and Moderna did not skip animal trials when testing their COVID-19 vaccines.
THE FACTS: As the race to authorize the use of COVID-19 vaccines continues, posts online are spreading misinformation about vaccine trials.
And: “Covid-19 vaccine did not kill every animal it was tested on”
WHAT WAS CLAIMED
All animals used in Covid-19 vaccine trials died months later from immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure.
There is no evidence for this.. The claim is based on a 2012 study looking at different vaccines. The animals, in this case mice, were euthanized as is standard procedure in this sort of trial. They did not die “months later” as claimed.
https://fullfact.org/online/covid-vaccine-animal-testing/
pfizer has an offshoot...zoetis...an animal vaccine company. they have facilities in CHYNA. nice company...they’ll even $ell you pet in$urance.
Perfect!
I see you are following your Tagline.
Yep. I’ve been holding out too on the Jab.
Glad I’ve held out.
Be nice and at least skim the article before name-calling us and hoaxing it, then adding text irrelevant to the OP.
And remember: this is not an attack on you. We’re only preparing arguments for the possibility when the vaccine is required for employment and economic activity and travel. We’re also worried about our loved ones who were vaxxed.
This article is reporting that the results of those animal tests were flawed.
You are welcome to post a link to any other animal tests with safety results. I can’t find any.
This seems to summarize what they found here:
“These results seem to indicate that lipid/mRNA nanoparticles, which code for the Spike protein, circulate throughout the body and then collect in a variety of organs and tissues, including the spleen and ovaries. This means that the vaccine is not remaining localized near the injection site and draining lymph nodes, but rather is also circulating in both blood and lymph and is subsequently concentrating in important organs. If this results in Spike protein being produced in unintended places including the brain, ovaries, and spleen, it may also be causing the immune system to attack these organs and tissues.”
Interesting site...thanks for the link!
Keep quoting MSM ‘fact-checkers’.
It’s what trolls do best.
There you go again quoting paragons of truth like AP, CNN, and Snopes.
Time will tell whose right and whose wrong about the experimental shots. I would prefer to be on the side that doesn’t have that crap in my body for the rest of my life. The research community and many in the medical community aren’t on the same page as to the safety of the experimental shots. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and what they want injected into their bodies.
An NHS Nurses Resignation Letter – “I am utterly dismayed and disheartened by my profession”
The most prestigious medical journal in the world, “The Lancet” has published a study indicating the COVID-19 “Vaccine” is only 0.84% effective . . . . as in less than one percent!
COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness—the elephant (not) in the room
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2666-5247(21)00069-0
The mRNA is human or animal?
They tried, but all the animals died. This gene therapy they call a “vaccine” has been tried for over 20 years and failed every time because the test subject animals all died.
“There is no evidence for this”
Yes, there is, and you know it. So don’t lie and claim what we already know to be not true just because you eugenics supporters say so.
Bill Gates, the owner of all these labs, said in an interview that all the animals had died.
Pfizer did not conduct animal tests (mice and rats) on the
BNT162b2 vaccine which is what they are injecting.
They tested surrogate luciferase modRNA, a variant of the subject mRNA vaccine.
In other words they used the results of tests that they had run earlier in their mRNA research, “formulations which are significantly different from the final vaccine.”
And remember: this is not an attack on you. We’re only preparing arguments for the possibility when the vaccine is required for employment and economic activity and travel. We’re also worried about our loved ones who were vaxxed.
Do you honestly think this, or any FR VP, cares about ‘the possibility when the vaccine is required for employment and economic activity and travel’ or that any of us who question these experimental, unproven shots are ‘also worried about our loved ones who were vaxxed’??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.