Posted on 05/30/2021 1:39:02 PM PDT by MNDude
“Trust Science.” Right?
Scientists?
BBBBBBBBwwwwwwwhhaaaaaaaaa!!!!
Science has become The Political, fact free, emotional, fascist profession.
The science was settled.
These scientist need to be investigated to determine if they have undisclosed ties with China. If so, they should be prosecuted. If nothing else, they should lose access to all government funds, clearances, etc. There has to be consequences to treason.
the article was feb 20 2020. On Feb 29th, Fauci said...don’t worry about this virus...AND Nancy Pelosi went to China Town and told the world to Come On Down...AND...Chuckie Scumee called President Trump a racist for shutting down incoming from China.
The Lancet? This is the leftard publication which was forced to retract a bogus study they claimed proved Hydroxychloroquine was a danger.
Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials.
The Lancet paper that halted global trials of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 because of fears of increased deaths has been retracted after a Guardian investigation found inconsistencies in the data.
Different year, different scientists and different theories. Why post a 15 month old article? We know where it originated. Check this out from yesterday.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/29/explosive-study-claims-to-prove-chinese-scientists-created-covid/
They are good little Nazis.
Saying just what their Nazi master wanted them to say.
Anything for a buck you know.
Exactly right.
All I had the see “The Lancet”
They have been caught lying before concerning HCQ. A medical rag.
Every single element of our country is infiltrated by the enemy.
Follow the money. They’re bought and paid for by the criminal CCP scumbags.
Like hanging!!
“The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins,”
BS.
China has NEVER EVER been open or transparent about their data on this outbreak.
This is propaganda at its highest.
If they disbelieve the hypothesis being put forth then rather than make asinine political statements they could just DISPROVE the un-natural origins theory.
But they can’t because they know the proposition has merit - so they attack the character of the reporting rather than the reporting itself.
That’s bad science, period.
Yes. That’s exactly what they did.
Are you an idiot?
Huh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.