Replies

I’m retired military. My wife and I were asked to take the “EXPERIMENTAL” “vaccine”. We both declined and told our PCP that we will NEVER take any of those “vaccines”. He asked our reason. We both had the same response.
1) they are NOT vaccines. 2) they are still to this day classified as “EXPERIMENTAL” and that we are NOT guinea pigs. 3) the survival rate for otherwise healthy people does not justify allowing an “EXPERIMENTAL” substance to be injected into us. 4) And, that the gov’t decision to not allow any of the Pharma’s to be held liable for any adverse effects to include permanent damage and DEATH, as as result of their “EXPERIMENTAL” drugs is totally unacceptable.
His response, he simply smiled.
His smile was one of affirmation of our reasoning. It was very obviously so. I was tempted to ask him if he had taken any of the Jabs but, didn’t ask. While the thought crossed my mind I didn’t want to put the man on the spot.

The writer is totally ignorant of the VAERS
Especially that VAERS is utter garbage.

Please let me explain
1)All providers are required to report ALL relevant adverse events for a vaccinated person, REGARDLESS of whether the provider believes the adverse event was caused by the vaccine.

For example my grandfather’s friend was vaccinated in february. In May he died suddenly of a burst aorta, which had nothing to do with vaccine. His doctor knew he had been vaccinated, and should have reported his death to VAERS. But most such deaths are not reported.

2) The number of fully vaccinated Americans was 25, 56, 100 and 133 million on March 1, April 1 May 1 and May 27 respectively. So over those 3 months we had 78 million vaccinated on average. 78 million is 30% of adults.

3) Typically 750,000 Americans die in three months 30% would mean that 220,000 would be vaccinated (Actually it more than that because the elderly have gotten vaccinated much more than the young, and the elderly are the most apt to die). Thus providers should have sent in at least 220,000 reported deaths to VAERS. VAERS says they got 5000. So the data is utter garbage.

What gives? Sometimes perhaps a provider believes that another provider made the report. Or sometimes he didn’t know about the vaccination, Or he’s too busy to fill out another government form. And perhaps CDC flacks throw out most of the reports to dodge work.

4) But for whatever reason, the Great CDC VAERS system is picking up only 2% of what it should. Utter garbage.

While an estimate of 1% of adverse are ever reported to the CDC in the first place

50% of recipients surveyed respond that they had fever so there should be about 100 million fevers in VAERS. 36,366 are reported so there's less than 0.04% reporting for fever in VAERS. But as seriousness of the event grows, reporting grows. There's no way the 1% you quote from here: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf (the "Harvard" study) applies to deaths. The more serious the event, the more likely a report. You need to make or get an estimate for the death underreporting.

Then you need to multiply the deaths by the underreporting inverse to get deaths that should have been reported. Then you need to compare to 0.008 / 365 * 100 million * number of days. You might choose 7 days for deaths and get an estimate of 15,342 exoected deaths. WIthout that comparison the numbers are not meaningful.

I keep posting the following information, but apparently most people are not aware of the actual VAERS system reporting situation.

When the vaccination program began in December VAERS only had the capacity (staff, etc.) to process 5-7,000 reports a week. Apparently they did not expect the avalanche of reports they received. They received substantially more than that each week so they fell way behind and with each new week they would try to backfill some of the earlier reports. That’s why the guy who does a great job keeping track of VAERS reports on BitChute keeps saying that VAERS had 59% of their reports just from Jan. and February. I don’t think he understands that they have not had the capacity to fully process the more recently received reports.

In February they were reporting early Jan. VAERS reports at a rate of 200-400 a day. The following week they would update early January to show hundreds more per day. This continued each subsequent week all the way through March when they finally topped out their daily January revisions at well over 3,000 per day.

They realized they needed additional capacity so gave General Dynamics an additional “add-on” contract for $16 million to hire additional staff and capacity.

A few weeks ago they finally were able to process 30,000+ each week and over the last few weeks they have reported that amount each week. Most of those are not current reports; they are catch-up.

It is absolutely true that VAERS only captures a small percentage of actual adverse events. It is a broken, poorly run system.

Europe’s EudraVigilence (a counterpart to VAERS) is a much better run system (though still flawed and suffers from under reporting, too) and despite the fact that Europe has vaccinated LESS than the U.S. EudraVigilence has reported over 12,000 deaths and over 1.3 million “adverse events.”

Because VAERS is so poorly run I doubt we will ever get close to those numbers though they probably do more closely reflect the reality of after vax events.

On the plus side, we are vaxxing at a much lower rate now so the current reports should be substantially declining once VAERS gets caught up.

Typical commercial for a new drug: 10 seconds about the drug, 50 seconds of disclaimers, all ending with “call your doctor”.

But for this new, non-approved, drug; not fully tested on humans, the commercials say: “it’s safe it’s effective and it’s free”.

Do the math.

So call your doctor. Have them recommend it - in writing. If you notice “vaccine hesitancy” from the doctor, you’ll get the point.