The writer is totally ignorant of the VAERS
Especially that VAERS is utter garbage.
Please let me explain
1)All providers are required to report ALL relevant adverse events for a vaccinated person, REGARDLESS of whether the provider believes the adverse event was caused by the vaccine.
For example my grandfather’s friend was vaccinated in february. In May he died suddenly of a burst aorta, which had nothing to do with vaccine. His doctor knew he had been vaccinated, and should have reported his death to VAERS. But most such deaths are not reported.
2) The number of fully vaccinated Americans was 25, 56, 100 and 133 million on March 1, April 1 May 1 and May 27 respectively. So over those 3 months we had 78 million vaccinated on average. 78 million is 30% of adults.
3) Typically 750,000 Americans die in three months 30% would mean that 220,000 would be vaccinated (Actually it more than that because the elderly have gotten vaccinated much more than the young, and the elderly are the most apt to die). Thus providers should have sent in at least 220,000 reported deaths to VAERS. VAERS says they got 5000. So the data is utter garbage.
What gives? Sometimes perhaps a provider believes that another provider made the report. Or sometimes he didn’t know about the vaccination, Or he’s too busy to fill out another government form. And perhaps CDC flacks throw out most of the reports to dodge work.
4) But for whatever reason, the Great CDC VAERS system is picking up only 2% of what it should. Utter garbage.
The writer is a well-qualified insurance industry data analyst.
Please let me explain
1)All providers are required to report ALL relevant adverse events for a vaccinated person, REGARDLESS of whether the provider believes the adverse event was caused by the vaccine.
A few days ago I went to the CDC page where it says all relevant adverse events must be reported for vaccines/events listed in an attached PDF. Covid-19 'vaccines' not on the attached PDF.
In addition, Harvard conducted a study years ago which demonstrated that approximately 1% of adverse events are reported to the CDC and that was before doctors were punished for candid remarks against the 'vaccines', and before medical staff and resources were drastically reduced.
Since Fauci/CDC are lying about the 'shots', the writer is using the only data source available to expose the fraud. I'm grateful to him.
I wouldn't say totally ignorant. The writer knows enough about databases to manipulate them and make it sound like she knows what she's talking about.
However, this writer has a long history of manipulating public information databases to spread insane conspiracy theories and misinformation.
For years this writer used the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system to falsely suggest thousands of 'deep state' officials were about to be indicted.
Its an old gimmick in the online con game, and the only surprise is how many folks here keep falling for it.