VAERS SYSTEM CONTINUES TO HEAVILY THROTTLE! 59% AE'S = JABS FEB OR OLDER AS OF 5/28/2021

bitchute.com ^ | 5/29/2021 | welcometheeagle88 on Bitchute.

[thecodont]

Thanks for sharing your experience.

[Truthoverpower]

The vaccine industry is pure evil

The vaccine theory is invalid

http://vaxtruth.org/

[Steve Van Doorn]

I read your post before. The problem is VAERS is skipping entries.
We have four people that did an analysis on this with one outlier. This one finds over +200,000 that skipped entries. A friend made his own script got +180,000. Eagle as you see in this video. The outlier I will not show as i believe it was an honest mistake with his script.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DoXk7JC1nh9n/

[ransomnote]

Ping

[delta7]

The CDC has lied, is lying, and will continue to lie.
——————

Very nicely put. We can add that this current slow Joe administration does the same, none can be trusted.

[Cathi]

Hi Steve: Naturally, it is hard for me to know for sure what the issue is with the data he is showing. But, a couple things stick out to me and I will speculate based on what I know about the situation.

First, as I have posted several times before on March 30 Nexstar (a news service) reported that the CDC had said they had received over 205,000 “adverse events” reports. On that day VAERS, itself, was reporting that they had a total of 44,000+ “adverse events.”

I was very surprised; while I already understood at that time that VAERS was very behind and doing weekly “catch-up” with their numbers....this indicated that they had only reported on about 20% of what they had received.

The next week a different reporter from a different news source reported that the CDC had told them that they had received over 233,000 “adverse events” reports. On VAERS they reported that same day (they do weekly reports on Friday’s) that they now had a total of over 51,000 reports.

My thoughts were: Okay they are still only processing 5-7,000 reports per week; but THEY WERE RECEIVING 28,000 OR MORE PER WEEK. Yikes! So I posted about it. No one responded.

The CDC as far as I can tell never made the mistake again of disclosing the actual number of reports they received. Sort of like how they dealt with reporting the “breakthrough cases” numbers....disclosing initially and then when they dramatically increased went into a cover up mode...:-)

So the fact that in the info you highlighted over 200,000 already numbered blank sequential reports do not actually appear in the VAERS data is not really surprising to me. They have not been processed yet.

Second I noticed a heavy concentration of J&J reports that have been processed showing up interspersed with long sequences of numbers that are blank in your data. This reminded me that 2 weeks ago Alex Berenson suggested that mostly only new J&J VAERS reports were showing up in the new VAERS Friday reports. He suggested the CDC may be holding back on the mRNA reports. I think his guess as to why the J&J data was featured and the mRNA reports were minimal is probably wrong.

I think, and this is strictly speculation on my part, is that they are still hundreds of thousands of reports behind (all the blank; but numbered lines), but that once the panic that was created when the news came out about the blood clots that were killing young women they decided to move J&J reports to the head of the line. They were trying to get a handle on how common this adverse effect was and they still do not have the capacity to process more than about 30,000+ per week. So, mRNA went on a temporary hold.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Lets cut to the root problem. They're a lot of injuries and deaths from the vaccines far greater then all vaccines ever made combined. They're not pausing this insanity.
They paused Janssen as you said, "I noticed a heavy concentration of J&J reports.... " Then they cut back on those reports and put Janssen back on the market. YET the two vaccines that have a higher injury and death rate doesn't miss a day on the market.

With that statement you made. It does seem you realize there is something wrong with the way they are conducting themselves. YET you say, "(holding back while showing more of J&J until it was paused. Then holding back on J&J to release the pause) was probably wrong (because they're simply behind"

They're creating a yoo-yoo effect on reporting at the prefect times.

Yet you stick with this statement "They were trying to get a handle on how common this adverse effect was (so they counted more J&J until they put it on pause.)"

Even if you're right.... You're missing the big picture. More deaths and injuries are a result of these vaccines then all vaccines combined AND They don't produce any antibodies. So, what the heck are they doing?

This is the same study that first said they had a 95% effectiveness they reported in December for Pfizer.
Peer-reviewed research from @TheLancet shows that the experimental vaccines reduce your chance of catching COVID-19 by:
Pfizer: 0.8%
Johnson & J: 1.2%
Moderna: 1.2%
AstraZeneca: 1.3%
So, basically NO prevention. No immunity. No antibodies.
https://archive.vn/4O1PI

[Cathi]

Steve, there is no one who is more opposed to these covid “vaccines” than I am. They are dangerous beyond measure since we have no idea of long term risk and immediate short term risk is totally unacceptable and unprecedented. I wouldn’t recommend one to my worst enemy.

I agree completely with Dr. McCullough that this is the greatest medical disgrace our nation ever had.

But, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind. Europe was investigating VITT from AstraZeneca and has since issued a warning and dramatically cut back on AstraZeneca usage.

VAERS was months behind in tracking the J&J blood clotting issue. Europe’s investigation likely pressured the CDC to take action. There were 8 known J&J cases so they pulled J&J VAERS reports forward, found 7 more and announced the total 15 along with a warning and their BS statement that “benefit outweighs the risk.” They have since reported a total of over 30 which is likely to continue to increase if they continue to administer it.

And, as an aside, I agree with you that “vaccine” efficacy is minimal and temporary and much better achieved with alternative protocols that do not interfere with your own innate immunity.

[jimjohn]

Typical commercial for a new drug: 10 seconds about the drug, 50 seconds of disclaimers, all ending with “call your doctor”.

But for this new, non-approved, drug; not fully tested on humans, the commercials say: “it’s safe it’s effective and it’s free”.

Do the math.

So call your doctor. Have them recommend it - in writing. If you notice “vaccine hesitancy” from the doctor, you’ll get the point.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "I agree completely with Dr. McCullough.. "
ha ha I'm listening to him right now he made last week. Odd.

said, "sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that"

you understand covid is a bioweapon right? That means it was man made and i believe delivered. The only question is who are involved? Bureaucrats maybe? you call that inept. i don't believe that.
To shorten this. I will make three points. if you have a question please ask.
1. It's a bio-weapon (Graphic below)
2. Delivery. When the virus first hit Wuhan china they closed off the city domestically. They actually built a moat around the city and guarded it with soldiers. It looked like escape from New York. International travel was open any place that wasn't taking people from Wuhan where "racists."
3. We know Fauci financed gain of function in Wuhan AND he said years ago Trump will see the worst pandemic during his presidency. Fauci wife Christine Grady head of bioethics (human experiments) at NIH removed Nuremberg codes. The list of evil things they did is endless. Such as: Testing before treatment. Surprising HCQ (fire burned warehouses and fake reports.) I can go on and on.

[DugwayDuke]

ocrp1982 wrote: “His response, he simply smiled. His smile was one of affirmation of our reasoning.”

Or, he simply found your anti-vaxx bias amusing.

[Cathi]

“But, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind.”

Yes, I think the virus is a bioweapon. The lab was working with the Chinese military to develop “gain of function.” I don’t believe making a virus more transmissible or more lethal or able to cross species improves function unless the function you are aiming for is destruction. China, Fauci, CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO and both political parties along with the media are truly enemies of the people.

But, I am pretty sure that the $15 an hour new General Dynamics hires are not responsible for the development or distribution of the covid virus. They are just working through an incredible, mind boggling and yes, UNEXPECTED deluge of VAERS reports.

You originally posted to me about the data video wherein much was being made about the “missing VAERS cases.”

I understand people frequently think there is some nefarious scheme behind everything; “but, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind.”

[metmom]

Even if you're right.... You're missing the big picture. More deaths and injuries are a result of these vaccines then all vaccines combined AND They don't produce any antibodies. So, what the heck are they doing?

Exactly what they are designed to do.

Kill and injure people.

[metmom]

I suspect the “vaccine” is the real bioweapon.

The virus was the means by which to scare people into lining up and literally begging for the shot.

See this post for my speculation on it.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3963109/posts?page=59#59

[Cathi]

Yes, it was interesting to hear Dr. McCullough speculate on that. He is clearly beginning to accept that theory.

[HypatiaTaught]

His response, he simply smiled.
His smile was one of affirmation of our reasoning. It was very obviously so. I was tempted to ask him if he had taken any of the Jabs but, didn’t ask. While the thought crossed my mind I didn’t want to put the man on the spot.

---

You have a better PCP than me. Currently looking for a new one.

Recently moved to South Dakota(6 months), my new doctor advised me to get the “shot”.

I said all of your reasons plus a couple more(like the shot doesn’t prevent you from getting covid nor does not prevent you from spreading covid)

She did not smile, instead she try to lecture me into taking it by trying to refute every one of my reasons and facts. She more time on this than my appointment which was to purely establish care as a new patient.

And she was proud to say she had the Moderna.

I am still looking for a new PCP.

[mac_truck]

The writer is totally ignorant of the VAERS

I wouldn't say totally ignorant. The writer knows enough about databases to manipulate them and make it sound like she knows what she's talking about.

However, this writer has a long history of manipulating public information databases to spread insane conspiracy theories and misinformation.

For years this writer used the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system to falsely suggest thousands of 'deep state' officials were about to be indicted.

Its an old gimmick in the online con game, and the only surprise is how many folks here keep falling for it.

[Treeless Branch]

I’m still shocked that almost all Freepers don’t know where the propaganda that the “vaccines are 95 percent effective” comes from. It comes from the Pfizer study. They misleadingly calculate the “effective” number by calculating the reduction in infections from the vaccinated versus the placebo which was 0.74 (placebo)-0.04 (vax)=0.7 and then they divide that result by the total placebo cases to get the 95% effective rate: 0.7/0.74=0.95. This formula is called the “relative effective rate” and is only commonly used by researchers and scientists to help them quickly analyze whether studies are Significant. This video explains it https://youtu.be/EDtdtxAdwyA. This is not a conspiracy theory. The NYTimes did an entire article partially describing it but obviously spinning it into propaganda.

[Jane Long]

They purposely make VAERS difficult to navigate. Gee....I wonder why. 🙃

This guy breaks down how to use VAERS, to obtain different types (and locations, etc) of reports....

How To Pull VAERS Reports

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWQ-DTr_fGw

[Jane Long]

I suspect the “vaccine” is the real bioweapon.

The virus was the means by which to scare people into lining up and literally begging for the shot.

---

Dr Peter McCullough agrees....

https://rumble.com/vhp8e1-massive-world-renowned-doctor-blows-lid-off-of-covid-vaccine.html

And, before the FR VPs attempt to smear Dr McCullough, here is his bio....

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA

Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology