Posted on 05/29/2021 7:08:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
The CDC is concealing adverse events following Covid-19 'vaccinations'. They appear to be selecting the less severe reactions for publication and withholding that which they don't want us to see. 59% of the reports in VAERS are from the first 84 million doses of 'vaccine'. The remaining 41% of reports in VAERS are during the time more than twice that number of doses were administered.
There are now more than 4000 reports of death following vaccination. These numbers support WelcomeTheEagle88's recent estimate that there have likely been at least 14,000 deaths reported to the CDC so far following Covid-19 vaccinations.
[ransomnote: A true vaccine would ordinarily be pulled from the market before so many deaths occurred]
Also, per the CDC, we won't see any follow up reports so filing a report while a person is dying means it will not be reported as 'death'.
There is no accountability. The CDC says it will have 4-6 weeks to review records before publishing them, then it deletes records after publication claiming they are duplicates. THere is no oversight - the CDC does what it wants to give the impression it wants.
Females out pace males in serious event repots, yet males outpace females in actual deaths, according to CDC.
At the 14:30 minute mark, he remarks it seems like people taking Beta Blockers are over represented among deaths. He notes they may be more sickly and therefore on Beta Blockers, or some other possible connection.
While an estimate of 1% of adverse are ever reported to the CDC in the first place, then the CDC/VAERS/Fauci then cook the books before they publish a fraction of those reports received.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Ping
The CDC has lied, is lying, and will continue to lie.
——————
Very nicely put. We can add that this current slow Joe administration does the same, none can be trusted.
Hi Steve: Naturally, it is hard for me to know for sure what the issue is with the data he is showing. But, a couple things stick out to me and I will speculate based on what I know about the situation.
First, as I have posted several times before on March 30 Nexstar (a news service) reported that the CDC had said they had received over 205,000 “adverse events” reports. On that day VAERS, itself, was reporting that they had a total of 44,000+ “adverse events.”
I was very surprised; while I already understood at that time that VAERS was very behind and doing weekly “catch-up” with their numbers....this indicated that they had only reported on about 20% of what they had received.
The next week a different reporter from a different news source reported that the CDC had told them that they had received over 233,000 “adverse events” reports. On VAERS they reported that same day (they do weekly reports on Friday’s) that they now had a total of over 51,000 reports.
My thoughts were: Okay they are still only processing 5-7,000 reports per week; but THEY WERE RECEIVING 28,000 OR MORE PER WEEK. Yikes! So I posted about it. No one responded.
The CDC as far as I can tell never made the mistake again of disclosing the actual number of reports they received. Sort of like how they dealt with reporting the “breakthrough cases” numbers....disclosing initially and then when they dramatically increased went into a cover up mode...:-)
So the fact that in the info you highlighted over 200,000 already numbered blank sequential reports do not actually appear in the VAERS data is not really surprising to me. They have not been processed yet.
Second I noticed a heavy concentration of J&J reports that have been processed showing up interspersed with long sequences of numbers that are blank in your data. This reminded me that 2 weeks ago Alex Berenson suggested that mostly only new J&J VAERS reports were showing up in the new VAERS Friday reports. He suggested the CDC may be holding back on the mRNA reports. I think his guess as to why the J&J data was featured and the mRNA reports were minimal is probably wrong.
I think, and this is strictly speculation on my part, is that they are still hundreds of thousands of reports behind (all the blank; but numbered lines), but that once the panic that was created when the news came out about the blood clots that were killing young women they decided to move J&J reports to the head of the line. They were trying to get a handle on how common this adverse effect was and they still do not have the capacity to process more than about 30,000+ per week. So, mRNA went on a temporary hold.
Steve, there is no one who is more opposed to these covid “vaccines” than I am. They are dangerous beyond measure since we have no idea of long term risk and immediate short term risk is totally unacceptable and unprecedented. I wouldn’t recommend one to my worst enemy.
I agree completely with Dr. McCullough that this is the greatest medical disgrace our nation ever had.
But, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind. Europe was investigating VITT from AstraZeneca and has since issued a warning and dramatically cut back on AstraZeneca usage.
VAERS was months behind in tracking the J&J blood clotting issue. Europe’s investigation likely pressured the CDC to take action. There were 8 known J&J cases so they pulled J&J VAERS reports forward, found 7 more and announced the total 15 along with a warning and their BS statement that “benefit outweighs the risk.” They have since reported a total of over 30 which is likely to continue to increase if they continue to administer it.
And, as an aside, I agree with you that “vaccine” efficacy is minimal and temporary and much better achieved with alternative protocols that do not interfere with your own innate immunity.
Typical commercial for a new drug: 10 seconds about the drug, 50 seconds of disclaimers, all ending with “call your doctor”.
But for this new, non-approved, drug; not fully tested on humans, the commercials say: “it’s safe it’s effective and it’s free”.
Do the math.
So call your doctor. Have them recommend it - in writing. If you notice “vaccine hesitancy” from the doctor, you’ll get the point.
ocrp1982 wrote: “His response, he simply smiled. His smile was one of affirmation of our reasoning.”
Or, he simply found your anti-vaxx bias amusing.
“But, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind.”
Yes, I think the virus is a bioweapon. The lab was working with the Chinese military to develop “gain of function.” I don’t believe making a virus more transmissible or more lethal or able to cross species improves function unless the function you are aiming for is destruction. China, Fauci, CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO and both political parties along with the media are truly enemies of the people.
But, I am pretty sure that the $15 an hour new General Dynamics hires are not responsible for the development or distribution of the covid virus. They are just working through an incredible, mind boggling and yes, UNEXPECTED deluge of VAERS reports.
You originally posted to me about the data video wherein much was being made about the “missing VAERS cases.”
I understand people frequently think there is some nefarious scheme behind everything; “but, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind.”
Exactly what they are designed to do.
Kill and injure people.
I suspect the “vaccine” is the real bioweapon.
The virus was the means by which to scare people into lining up and literally begging for the shot.
See this post for my speculation on it.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3963109/posts?page=59#59
Yes, it was interesting to hear Dr. McCullough speculate on that. He is clearly beginning to accept that theory.
His response, he simply smiled.
His smile was one of affirmation of our reasoning. It was very obviously so. I was tempted to ask him if he had taken any of the Jabs but, didn’t ask. While the thought crossed my mind I didn’t want to put the man on the spot.
Recently moved to South Dakota(6 months), my new doctor advised me to get the “shot”.
I said all of your reasons plus a couple more(like the shot doesn’t prevent you from getting covid nor does not prevent you from spreading covid)
She did not smile, instead she try to lecture me into taking it by trying to refute every one of my reasons and facts. She more time on this than my appointment which was to purely establish care as a new patient.
And she was proud to say she had the Moderna.
I am still looking for a new PCP.
I wouldn't say totally ignorant. The writer knows enough about databases to manipulate them and make it sound like she knows what she's talking about.
However, this writer has a long history of manipulating public information databases to spread insane conspiracy theories and misinformation.
For years this writer used the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system to falsely suggest thousands of 'deep state' officials were about to be indicted.
Its an old gimmick in the online con game, and the only surprise is how many folks here keep falling for it.
I’m still shocked that almost all Freepers don’t know where the propaganda that the “vaccines are 95 percent effective” comes from. It comes from the Pfizer study. They misleadingly calculate the “effective” number by calculating the reduction in infections from the vaccinated versus the placebo which was 0.74 (placebo)-0.04 (vax)=0.7 and then they divide that result by the total placebo cases to get the 95% effective rate: 0.7/0.74=0.95. This formula is called the “relative effective rate” and is only commonly used by researchers and scientists to help them quickly analyze whether studies are Significant. This video explains it https://youtu.be/EDtdtxAdwyA. This is not a conspiracy theory. The NYTimes did an entire article partially describing it but obviously spinning it into propaganda.
They purposely make VAERS difficult to navigate. Gee....I wonder why. 🙃
This guy breaks down how to use VAERS, to obtain different types (and locations, etc) of reports....
How To Pull VAERS Reports
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWQ-DTr_fGw
I suspect the “vaccine” is the real bioweapon.
The virus was the means by which to scare people into lining up and literally begging for the shot.
Dr Peter McCullough agrees....
https://rumble.com/vhp8e1-massive-world-renowned-doctor-blows-lid-off-of-covid-vaccine.html
And, before the FR VPs attempt to smear Dr McCullough, here is his bio....
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, FACP, FACC, FAHA, FCRSA, FCCP, FNKF, FNLA
Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine
Board Certified Internist and Cardiologist
President Cardiorenal Society of America
Editor-in-Chief, Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Editor-in-Chief, Cardiorenal Medicine
Senior Associate Editor, American Journal of Cardiology
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.