Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cathi
Lets cut to the root problem. They're a lot of injuries and deaths from the vaccines far greater then all vaccines ever made combined. They're not pausing this insanity.
They paused Janssen as you said, "I noticed a heavy concentration of J&J reports.... " Then they cut back on those reports and put Janssen back on the market. YET the two vaccines that have a higher injury and death rate doesn't miss a day on the market.

With that statement you made. It does seem you realize there is something wrong with the way they are conducting themselves. YET you say, "(holding back while showing more of J&J until it was paused. Then holding back on J&J to release the pause) was probably wrong (because they're simply behind"

They're creating a yoo-yoo effect on reporting at the prefect times.

Yet you stick with this statement "They were trying to get a handle on how common this adverse effect was (so they counted more J&J until they put it on pause.)"

Even if you're right.... You're missing the big picture. More deaths and injuries are a result of these vaccines then all vaccines combined AND They don't produce any antibodies. So, what the heck are they doing?

This is the same study that first said they had a 95% effectiveness they reported in December for Pfizer.
Peer-reviewed research from @TheLancet shows that the experimental vaccines reduce your chance of catching COVID-19 by:
Pfizer: 0.8%
Johnson & J: 1.2%
Moderna: 1.2%
AstraZeneca: 1.3%
So, basically NO prevention. No immunity. No antibodies.
https://archive.vn/4O1PI


27 posted on 05/30/2021 2:52:55 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Steve Van Doorn

Steve, there is no one who is more opposed to these covid “vaccines” than I am. They are dangerous beyond measure since we have no idea of long term risk and immediate short term risk is totally unacceptable and unprecedented. I wouldn’t recommend one to my worst enemy.

I agree completely with Dr. McCullough that this is the greatest medical disgrace our nation ever had.

But, sometimes bureaucratic incompetency is just that. The “missing” VAERS numbers are not mysterious. The processing of those reports are months behind. Europe was investigating VITT from AstraZeneca and has since issued a warning and dramatically cut back on AstraZeneca usage.

VAERS was months behind in tracking the J&J blood clotting issue. Europe’s investigation likely pressured the CDC to take action. There were 8 known J&J cases so they pulled J&J VAERS reports forward, found 7 more and announced the total 15 along with a warning and their BS statement that “benefit outweighs the risk.” They have since reported a total of over 30 which is likely to continue to increase if they continue to administer it.

And, as an aside, I agree with you that “vaccine” efficacy is minimal and temporary and much better achieved with alternative protocols that do not interfere with your own innate immunity.


28 posted on 05/30/2021 3:42:12 AM PDT by Cathi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Even if you're right.... You're missing the big picture. More deaths and injuries are a result of these vaccines then all vaccines combined AND They don't produce any antibodies. So, what the heck are they doing?

Exactly what they are designed to do.

Kill and injure people.

33 posted on 05/30/2021 5:25:40 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Steve Van Doorn

I’m still shocked that almost all Freepers don’t know where the propaganda that the “vaccines are 95 percent effective” comes from. It comes from the Pfizer study. They misleadingly calculate the “effective” number by calculating the reduction in infections from the vaccinated versus the placebo which was 0.74 (placebo)-0.04 (vax)=0.7 and then they divide that result by the total placebo cases to get the 95% effective rate: 0.7/0.74=0.95. This formula is called the “relative effective rate” and is only commonly used by researchers and scientists to help them quickly analyze whether studies are Significant. This video explains it https://youtu.be/EDtdtxAdwyA. This is not a conspiracy theory. The NYTimes did an entire article partially describing it but obviously spinning it into propaganda.


38 posted on 05/30/2021 7:26:56 AM PDT by Treeless Branch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Steve Van Doorn; Cathi; ransomnote

They purposely make VAERS difficult to navigate. Gee....I wonder why. 🙃

This guy breaks down how to use VAERS, to obtain different types (and locations, etc) of reports....

How To Pull VAERS Reports

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWQ-DTr_fGw


39 posted on 05/30/2021 7:41:09 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson