Posted on 05/27/2021 7:45:08 PM PDT by RandFan
No, it sure isn’t.
You can add words and claim it’s quoted from my post, but then people can actually click on my post and see that I didn’t see that.
Billions of people around the world are lining up to take the western vaccines. So when those billions are all dead - since the vaccine is a bioweapon and we’ll all be dead by the end of next flu season - what’s the point? There’s nobody left at that point.
This is the problem with all conspiracy theories: when you play the tape all the way through, it looks absolutely ridiculous. There’s a reason for that...
This young woman showed a vid of her father during a private emotional conversation? I hope she is disinherited
If you follow the chain of replies, you arrive at 55 (https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3963086/posts?page=55#55) which said - in part:
“The so-called vaccine is the real bioweapon. What an ingenious but incredibly evil way to get people to line up and beg for something that would ultimately kill them.”
So apparently 70-80% of the US population is about to die from vaccination. Just looking for a date when we can expect this to happen so I can mark my calendar for when to come back and laugh at this ridiculous post being proven wrong.
🔝
“ She didn’t listen and even said she won’t see me anymore unless I get vaccinated.”
Then she’s out of the will…. Have a good life.
I’m sure that will change her mind real quick. Anyone that gives an ultimatum like this doesn’t deserve your savings.
American Catholics have become inured to so many gravely sinful practices imposed upon them, not only by satan-loving secular sociopaths, but sadly, by their own parish pastors and local ordinaries.
To become “woke” to these practices and the urgent need to avoid them is to self-alienate from all of the pod people by which one sadly finds oneself surrounded.
What happened to explaining reality to your kids and letting them learn things the hard way if they don’t listen?
What is a TikTok?
She probably won’t die, but she’ll never give him Grandkids...
No, Jefferson used inalienable as I recall.
I’m sorry to hear that. Yes, I did do the GS ping, but just haven’t had much gumption the last years. All my medical issues don’t help. But then, I don’t see many dog pings anyway!
Our GS died in 2014, 7 years ago about exactly. We now have a cat for the last 2 years!
Why in the hell would anyone 20 yr. old even consider getting vaccinated WHY?? I am in my 60’s and there is NO WAY I am taking this damn shot!! My 91 year old mom is in my home and there is NO WAY she is taking that damn shot either, my mom seldom goes out we take walks outside together if she has a Dr. appt. we are required to mask inside any building in CA. We had a dear family friend 70 yrs. old VERY HEALTHY had his second dose of vaccine 4 weeks ago on a Friday his wife woke up next to his deceased body on the next morning he wasn’t feeling well Friday evening went to sleep and never woke up!! There is just not enough known about this damn vaccine!!
There's no next wave. There's going to be small local outbreaks.
"These estimates by the UK health industry shows very high figures by those that are vaccinated. page 18 gives the best statistics. It looks like about 60% of those that go too the hospital have two doses. 80% of the deaths will be those that took two doses."
Did you read what they said in there? They explained exactly why that is:
"This is because vaccine uptake has been so high in the oldest age groups (modelled here at 95% in the over 50-year olds). There are therefore 5% of over 50-year olds who have not been vaccinated, and 95% x 10% = 9.5% of over 50-year olds who are vaccinated but, nevertheless, not protected against death. This is not the result of vaccines being ineffective, merely uptake being so high."
It's easier to see with numbers behind it. Let's look at 1 million elderly folks. Let's assume 95% of them get vaccinated. Let's assume the vaccine is 90% effective at reducing the risk of death in our elderly population (i.e. some are so frail not even a vaccine can help them). So we have 950,000 vaccinated, 50,000 unvaccinated. Now let's expose all of them in a challenge trial to test our vaccine. Of the 50,000 unvaccinated, about 5% (or 2,500) die. At that same rate, we would expect 47,500 to die in a population of 950,000, but these people got vaccinated, reducing that risk by 90%. So 4,750 vaccinated elderly folks in our population who are vaccinated now die in our challenge trials.
You could look at the number of deaths out of context and say that almost twice as many people who are vaccinated died, but making that claim ignores the fact that the population sizes are wildly different. If you adjust for the size of the population (2,500 deaths in 50,000 people - 5% - vs 4,750 deaths in 950,000 people - 0.5%), you see why the original claim doesn't mean what one might think it means without that context.
You think calling mRNA “vaccines” gene therapy is stunning ignorance?
The antibodies should offer some protection, but everyone keeps pushing this vaccine.
Yes. Vaccine and therapy are two different things with different objectives.
Vaccine = prevent a disease from occurring.
Therapy = treat a disease that has already occurred.
The mRNA is a vaccine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.