Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Years late and billions more: The USS Gerald R. Ford is a lesson in how the Navy builds ships
Daily Press ^ | 5/23/2021 | DAVE RESS

Posted on 05/25/2021 8:19:16 PM PDT by logi_cal869

For the past 1½ years, on 18 trips off the Virginia and North Carolina coasts, sailors and shipyard workers from Newport News have prepped the Navy’s newest carrier for deployment — 27% over its original budget and years behind schedule.

The costliest single item on the Department of Defense’s shopping list, the USS Gerald R Ford has been on a fast track to launch a series of new technologies intended to boost the Navy’s striking power for at least the next 50 years.

It is a fast track that started two decades ago.

[snip]

Over the past 18 months of post-delivery tests and trial, “we really started stressing the ship’s 23 new technologies, especially EMALS (the electromagnetic catapult) and AAG (advanced arresting gear),” he said.

“In 18 months, we corrected 99% of the 9,000-plus work items outstanding at ship’s delivery,” Downey said..

Each of the 11 weapons elevators is unique, with its own operating demands — a large part of what is needed for the final four is to check out how well the weapons team can work with them without any problems. The first seven have run up and down more than 14,200 times.

The carrier’s self-defense missiles and 4,500-rounds-a-minute cannon, which depend on accurate readings from its radar to hit attacking planes, missiles or ships, are certified as ready for action.

The five-phase test of those systems over the past few months, finally completed in April, also proved the much-questioned dual band radar could provide accurate target identification and tracking. Concerns that electronic interference could hinder helicopter flight operations were resolved in recent tests involving over 500 helicopter flights, and a temporary restriction for the radar during helicopter operations was eliminated.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailypress.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: cvn78; flattop; fordclass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Incredible summation of multi-year details in what I politely phrase a 'poorly-written article', but it's the first time I've read all of these details in one place, along with the fact that the vessel is coming ready as a warship.

It looks like we finally got it (very nearly) fit to serve.

1 posted on 05/25/2021 8:19:16 PM PDT by logi_cal869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Good luck finding capable sailors to man this thing. The freaks, geeks and snowflakes Bimentia’s military is recruiting are not going to cut it.


2 posted on 05/25/2021 8:32:47 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

“… 4,500-rounds-a-minute cannon…”

I can’t imagine what that would sound like. At that speed it might be more of a steady tone than “brrrrrrrp”.

75 cycles per second. A bit higher in pitch than the 60 cycle kick drum “thump”. Close to a really low “D”. Incredible.


3 posted on 05/25/2021 8:34:34 PM PDT by jdsteel ("A Republic, Madam, if you can keep it." Sorry Ben, looks like we blew it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

We could be approaching an era of advanced technologies where these expensive ships, even with their defenses, could become easy targets.


4 posted on 05/25/2021 8:41:28 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

In my comment, I was actually strictly referring to the ship itself.

I’m amazed that they appear to actually have worked out all the bugs. Now to find out how reliable those systems are under combat conditions.

The question of crew now looms large...


5 posted on 05/25/2021 8:43:40 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

I think their biggest problem has been it’s new catapult system...

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/06/11/navy-carrier-fords-high-tech-emals-catapult-system-breaks-during-sea-trials.html/amp


6 posted on 05/25/2021 8:47:38 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

Pretty sure that’s the cycle rate of the current Phalanx gun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zsf38NYzo5Q


7 posted on 05/25/2021 8:48:37 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
What a beauty! I'd be proud to serve aboard that baby...

Except it looks like it's listing a little...

j/k!

8 posted on 05/25/2021 8:49:20 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

The whole ship had many new forms of technology and that is why so many issues have surfaced. Not surprising and it should help the other ships in the class being built have an easier time fitting out.


9 posted on 05/25/2021 8:53:01 PM PDT by Destroyer Sailor (Revenge is a dish best served co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neodad

The article does go into that a bit. Worth reading.


10 posted on 05/25/2021 8:53:52 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

On Nimitz, back when we launched and recovered EA-3B aircraft, parking it on an outer port side spot called the ‘finger’ resulted in an immediate three degree port list.


11 posted on 05/25/2021 9:03:58 PM PDT by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

All it seems to take now to destroy a ship is a fire in port.


12 posted on 05/25/2021 9:04:23 PM PDT by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neodad

“I think their biggest problem has been it’s new catapult system...”

That’s what they get for trying to save the planet.


13 posted on 05/25/2021 9:06:55 PM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Russian tanks didn’t have AC like ours. In an all out war they figured all the factories would be destroyed. No automatic transmission. It could be 160 degrees inside.


14 posted on 05/25/2021 9:20:47 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GreyHoundSailor

Wow, had to look that up. Looks like a big boy, and real hefty when at its “maximum overload take-‐off” weight (had to look that up too).

When it was parked and fully loaded on the finger, causing that three degree list, did it impose any restrictions on the operations of the ship? If that’s secret and you’d have to kill me if you told me, DON’T TELL ME! :-)


15 posted on 05/25/2021 9:25:06 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if China has incriminating documents on the "President's" son, doesn't that basically mean that we're building this new carrier for China?

What about extortion am I missing here?

16 posted on 05/25/2021 9:58:54 PM PDT by The Duke (Search for 'Sydney Ducks' and understand what is needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

We’d try to make only port turns until the engineers could level the ship. 1987 was the last time these A/C were on our CVN. Ranger 12 hit the barricade, slid off the angle deck and sank with all seven crew.


17 posted on 05/25/2021 10:01:17 PM PDT by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
When they built the USS Enterprise (CVN65) they used submarine nuclear reactors because they had not developed one for a carrier. After putting 8 submarine reactors in it they decided to build two conventional carriers while they figured out the carrier reactor.

I think that building two more Nimitz carriers while they figured out the catapults, arresting gear and elevators on the Ford might have been a wise move.
18 posted on 05/25/2021 10:18:22 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

OH GIVE ME A BREAK! What about the USS jimmy carter? I really don’t think the taxpayer should have to pay to surrender.


19 posted on 05/25/2021 10:48:29 PM PDT by The Right Edge (Staunch Trump Supporter AND PROUD to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

I would be more impressed if they only had to say, “The systems worked as promised, and the ship was delivered early.”

No, it is not simple engineering. But it is their ONLY JOB.


20 posted on 05/25/2021 10:49:16 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson