I think everyone knows by now that VAERS is not to be trusted.
Pro-vax or anti-vax. Don’t Matter. VAERS and the CDC make up stuff on a daily basis. None of it matches the truth.
Whatever that may be.
The voices in your head telling you stuff in terms of "must" now?
That's when it gets serious.
Maybe define what VAERS is?
They haven’t the slightest idea of the damage caused by the “vaccine”. Shots are being given in supermarkets, drug stores, street corners, etc. and there is no way that any follow up is being done. Those done in hospitals or by doctors may or may not have follow up depending if they have a doctor/patient (primary care physician) relationship and record access.
Thank you for your time and efforts. From the small glimpse we get to see on VAERS these vaccines should’ve been pulled already.
Every death in the United States is subject to a medical investigation to determine the cause of death. Thus far, there are zero deaths where anyone has stated that a COVID-19 vaccine was the cause of a person’s death or contributed to the person’s death anywhere in the United States.
Meanwhile, the vaccines are saving lives. No amount of anti-vaccine hysteria can change that. No amount of wild and crazy claims about a million dead bodies (which don’t exist) can change that. But of course, if the vaccines don’t cure death - regardless of cause - then they must be worthless in the eyes of anti-vaccine extremists.
Save the viruses! Won’t somebody think of the poor viruses?!
Thank you for this information.
It appears that whatever the numbers are, its far beyond a rate where someone should be putting a pause on this program. At least I see they are giving warnings - to a degree.
On a sidebar note, I am also making an anecdotal estimate that most of the country has NOT had this injection as of this time. Here are my reasons:
1. It was estimated that just over 40% of Americans would reject the injection, since the same number rejected the normal flu shots each year. Its assumed these Americans would reject any type of shot.
2. The media campaign. If there is/was cooperation from the public at the level being reported, there would be no need for this campaign. In fact, they would be better off addressing the concerns in a sober matter.
3. As much as social media my try, it is impossible to censor an important issue when people are actually looking for it. If there is a demand for it, it will be on other platforms. And as we too often forget these days, people still talk to one another. I can say I’ve overheard at least 3 conversations between people openly talking about themselves or associates dealing with adverse affects. This has to effect the demand, and reports from this area state the supplies are high.
4. As the recent mask policies, in overheard discussions, it appears most who are still wearing masks are the ones that have been “injected”. Those not wearing masks are clearly less concerned. Having dinner with 10 friends the other night, and only the injected were masked until seated. Noticed the same during a wake at my home a few weeks ago. I suspect there is something more psychological than political about it.
So if you are reading this and still on the fence for themselves or their children, here’s my advice:
Consult your physician. If they insist the injection is of value, have them give it to you in writing. If they are not willing to do that, there’s your answer.
just my $0.02
jimjohn
For those who prefer other methods of looking at the data, this researcher walks through analyses indicating, among other things, that deaths from the Covid 'shots' are not coincidental and invites input contradicting her findings.
Here's a video from a few days ago wherein the head of the CDC urges pregnant women to get 'vaccinated' and that she's unaware of any indications they shouldn't.
From the article: “Assuming 1/2 of all post ‘vaccine’ deaths were being reported to the CDC , the total adjusted estimate for adverse events following Covid ‘vaccination’ is 610,000 deaths and 50 million adverse events, according to Benevenidos’ analysis.”
If this were true, and it isn’t remotely, then there would be between 300,000 and 600,000 excess deaths that show up in the mortality statistics.
If this were true, and it isn’t remotely, then approximately one person in five would have experienced an adverse event. (50,000,000 events, 260,000,000 doses administered).
If anyone believes that hundreds of thousands of healthcare professionals would remain silent in the face of 600,000 deaths and 50 million adverse reactions, they must have an incredibly low opinion of doctors, nurses, etc,.
VAERS is the Wikipedia of the Pandemic. Anyone can enter anything and VAERS can be packed with bovine excrement, just like Wikipedia
Doesn’t matter....for every person who died after recieving the vaccine the probability of death by vaccine equals 1.
based on a Harvard study which found only about 1% of actual events are ever reported to the CDC,
That was then, and probably doesn't apply to the current vaccination campaign. This time everyone gets the sheet of paper with the VAERS hotline and VAERS website. You can see from reading the reports on the website that people have read the paper and are dutifully reporting their sore arm or fever.
For the shots that the Harvard study is based on, lots of people get them at the doctor and collect the paperwork at the end. They don't just go for one shot. Few people read the paper about VAERS for routine shots. With these shots there is awareness of vaccine novelty and adverse effects (e.g. as reported by people on Facebook). That naturally leads to more reporting.
So while I agree that VAERS is an undercount, there are already overcounts in VAERS itself.
There are many reports like this: "This is a 93 year old with significant heart issues?EF of 20% among other comorbidities. He died suddenly approximately 0430, it is unlikely it was related to receiving the vaccine"
or "Pt on hospice in facility for severe cardiomyopathy unable to perform interventions received vaccine without adverse sequelae died 5 days later. Reporting as required. Narrative: Reporting as required patient death 5 days after immunization with Pfizer vaccine. However, no adverse sequelae were noted to the vaccine in the 15minute observation period, nor in the days following the immunization related to the vaccine...."
Those all have to be factored out or removed from the equation.
I am getting my second Dose of the Moderna Vaccine this Wednesday. I had no side effects from the first one.
I have Leukemia and consulted my Oncologist before getting it. He was more concerned what would happen if I contracted the Kung Flu than any bad reaction to the Vaccine.
I was on the fence on whether to go ahead and get it for a few Months while everyone in my circle of Family and Friends got the Vaccine. Ultimately, my Oncologist made the call.
That being said, if you don’t want the Vaccine, don’t get it. This agree to get the Vaccine with a Gun pointed at your Head stuff is getting really absurd.
It’s the frigging Godfather Movie come to life.
READ LATER.
My favorite “adverse events” list is of “adverse events” that happen after I get out of bed...
Can’t imagine anyone is buying this garbage that you’re always careful to post without the prominent disclai9mer.
I don’t understand your numbers. 610,000 deaths since Dec doesn’t mesh with the total mortality of 595K in 18 months, about 300K since Biden took office. The 330K that died last year and the 200K through at least March of this year had no vaccine available to them (outside of nursing homes) because of botched and spotty rollouts.
My belief is the longer we go into the pandemic, the higher the odds of exposure for those who haven’t been vaccinated. So when they do get vaccinated, they may already have been exposed to the virus and be in the first few days of active but still asymptomatic infection, in which case, the vaccine won’t help them. For instance, an infected health care worker carries it into a nursing home 3 days before vaccines are given. Alternately, could be those that get vaccinated and disregard the 21 days to antibody strength timeframe, catch the virus a few days later and die before antibody strength has been built. (such as the Calif girl who flew to the east 3 days after vaccination and got infected). Contact tracing might tell a clearer story, but the govt tracing program was a huge financial waste with little real data that’s been shared.
So don’t get a vaccine.
No one cares what you do.
Ranting on Free Republic changes no minds and simply confuses the easily confused.
2700 deaths out of 287,000,000 injections is not a meaningful statistic. Without an assessment of the cause of death, comorbidities, or the age and health status of these reports—the figure is meaningless.
The statistics used in medical studies is usually the purview of people with math degrees and advanced degrees in statistics.
I don’t have that background. I am guessing you don’t either.
These posts are akin to standing by the side of the road, pointing at the sky, and screaming.
I understand that people don’t want the vaccination. I am confident that most of them could not articulate a reason why not. The only reasonable response is “I want to wait longer.” And that’s fine.
More people would die—and younger healthier people would die—if we handed out 287 million peanut butter sandwiches or Shrimp cocktails.
In the next year, almost 11,000 of these 287,000,000 million people will die, every day. How do you explain that?
Dang!
There you go, confusing the issue with facts...
Everyone should watch this. Hands down the best run down on the covid vaccines to date. Stephanie Seneff, four advanced degrees from MIT, 50 years with MIT and is their senior research scientist in micro biology.
She does an excellent job walking us through what was done to the mRNA then steps us through where the mRNA goes, what it does, what it interacts with, and what all these things do and can do theoretically.
I simply cannot recommend it enough and have watched it near two times and am learning more every time.
FWIW.
Coronavirus PING!