I'm not criticizing her resume, I'm criticizing her assertion that SARS CoV-2 evolved (artificially, in her view) from SARS CoV-1.
She unambiguously said if that evolution was a natural process it would have taken 800 years, but:
"This (SARS CoV-2) occurred from SARS 1 in a decade"."
I understand why you want to pretend she didn't say this, but she did.
Calling her an idiot makes you the idiot...
I'm being charitable in calling her an idiot.
The alternative is assuming she's intentionally trying to deceive which would be reprehensible.
> “This (SARS CoV-2) occurred from SARS 1 in a decade”
And what’s wrong with that statement?
I know the answer but I just want to hear you explain why it makes her an ‘idiot’.
Who the heck cares about your critique of her scientific view! This has to do with our health and health of our kids and grandkids! No way do you give Me or Mine an untested unproven shot of toxins for a virus that is in the 95 plus percentile survival for all age groups. Get over yourself!