Ping
I thought you already knew how to post.
Were you excited or something?
Killed(shots) if you do and killed(government) if you don’t
thanks ‘note
Any other new drug with this kind of ATROCIOUS ADVERSE EFFECT history would not have made it past the lab-rat stage of trials.
Oh, RIIIGHT.
We skipped the ‘lab-rat’ part of the established procedure for this one!
Tip of the iceberg. Don’t believe me, do your own research.
COVID Vaccine Deaths: The Numbers Point to a Catastrophe
https://www.magadon.net/covid-vaccine-deaths-the-numbers-point-to-a-catastrophe/
I have a preexisting condition that has severely flared since my vaccination. Not sure it has anything to do with my situation but others/friends that I am in touch with with the same condition has reported a similar reaction. The VAERS group sent me an email a few days ago wanting details.
Fyi: good vax info in today’s AndWeKnow report on rumble
Utter popycock.
Last I looked in VAERS, there were 4,000 or so reported deaths that MAY have occurred after vaccination.
First, as we all know, an adverse event after vaccination DOES NOT PROVE the vaccination “caused” the event.
That said, let’s assume that 100% of the reported deaths (4,000 or so) were indeed totally caused by the vaccination (they weren’t, but for sake of example).
4,000 / 160,177,280 shots given to date = .000024972.
Multiply by 100 to get percentage.
That results in a .00249% chance (assuming every last reported VAERS record of death was indeed “caused by” the shot - which they weren’t).
Now, let’s look at some other everyday activities like getting into a car and driving somewhere.
OOPSIE! Guess what? Your chance of dying in a car wreck in your lifetime is 1 in 103. That’s 0.97%.
So, your odds of dying in a car accident (0.97%) is 389.55X MORE LIKELY than your odds of dying from the vaccine (0.00249%) - and that’s ASSUMING every last VAERS record was indeed “causal”, which of course they are not. Let that sink in..your odds of dying in a car accident in your lifetime are nearly FOUR HUNDRED TIMES more likely than your odds of dying from the vaccine. FOUR HUNDRED TIMES more likely.
Gonna stop driving your cars? Just curious. (And please spare me the inevitable “but, but, BUT..the numbers in VAERS are ALL FAKE and there are a gazillion trazillion deaths NOT being reported in VAERS!) because knowing FR, I can bet $1,000,000 that’s EXACTLY the response that’s coming from the vaccine haters..when the facts don’t support your position, change the facts! Or allege the facts are all made up..so please don’t bother.
I stopped watching when she made the ludicrous claim that if the vaccines weren't causing the adverse effects you should expect to see a straight line graph of events over time following the injections.
That is, the number of reported events shouldn't drop off sharply in the days following the injection if the jab didn't cause the effect.
This is trivially wrong on it's face and I'll give her the benefit of the doubt that she doesn't understand VAERS.
It's not like people are tracked following a vaccination to see how many adverse events occur. VAERS represents events voluntarily reported following a shot.
This means the person reporting the event has to associate it with the vaccination in some way, which they are much more likely to do if the event occurs the day of or day after the event than if it occurs a week later.
The exact same number of events could be happening but they will be much more likely to be reported to VAERS the closer to the time of vaccination.
This is about as basic as it gets when analyzing this data and the fact that she doesn't get it at all makes me resent the time I wasted listening to any of her nonsense.
Thanks for posting.
She delves into the VAERS numbers.....
And, as we know.....these numbers are up, significantly, over prior reporting years.
Dr. Jessica Rose has a BSc in Applied Mathematics and completed her MSc in Immunology at Memorial University of Newfoundland in Canada. She completed her PhD in Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University and then did her first Post Doctorate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Molecular Biology.
She is now doing a second Post Doctorate at the Technion where she will explore the structure and function of transport proteins in bacteria from both experimental and computational points of view.
But they’re mostly safe…
Sorry! We're busy running around with our hair on fire because Imgur is over capacity! This can happen when the site is under a very heavy load, or while we're doing maintenance.
Please try again in a few minutes.
I have tried several times now, with no success.
PhD Researcher Analyzes VAERS Data and Concludes COVID Shots are Causing Death and Serious Injuries
Apparently there are a lot of freepers who do not understand how VAERS analysis works. Naturally they do not compare the number of heart attacks or deaths to the number in the general population. 8,000 people a day die in the U.S. They do not report those deaths to VAERS. Only adverse events (including deaths) connected to the vaccine are supposed to be reported and then some day evaluated for causation (it sometimes takes years so I wasn’t being snarky when I said “some day.”) The 4,674 “after vax deaths) and over 300,000 “adverse events reports” are unprecedented in VAERS 31 year history.
This is from Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Standard Operating Procedures
Please note: PRRs compare the proportion of a specific AE following a specific vaccine versus the proportion of the same AE following receipt of another vaccine.
Two main approaches to data mining are Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRRs) and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Means [11–13]. Both have published literature suggesting criteria for detecting “signals” [14]. PRR will be used at CDC for potential signal detection; Empirical Bayesian data mining will be performed by FDA.
After initial licensure or approval of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, initial reports may be too few to allow for data mining immediately. As the data mature, PRR and Empirical Bayesian data mining can then be used. 2.3.1 Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) CDC will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed. PRRs compare the proportion of a specific AE following a specific vaccine versus the proportion of the same AE following receipt of another vaccine (see equation below Table 4).
A safety signal is defined as a PRR of at least 2, chi-squared statistic of at least 4, and 3 or more cases of the AE following receipt of the specific vaccine of interest. CDC will apply appropriate comparator vaccines (e.g., adjuvanted vaccines like Shingrix and/or Fluad for adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccines) and adjust for severity and age distributions where applicable.
Table 4. Calculation of Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) Specific AE All other AE Specific vaccine A B All other vaccines C D PRR = [a/(a+b)] [c/(c+d)]
2.3.2 Data mining FDA will perform data mining at least biweekly (with stratified data mining monthly) using empirical Bayesian data mining to identify AEs reported more frequently than expected following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, using published criteria [12, 17 14]. Vaccine product-specific AE pairs following specific COVID-19 vaccines with reporting proportions at least twice that of other vaccines in the VAERS database (i.e., lower bound of the 90% confidence interval of the Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean [EB05] >2) will be evaluated.
Data mining runs can be adjusted and/or stratified by possible confounding variables such as age, sex, season of administration, and type of vaccines. FDA and CDC will share and discuss results of data mining analyses and signals.
2.3.3 Crude reporting rates If needed for internal purposes, crude reporting rates will be calculated based on COVID19 vaccine doses distributed, when a source of doses distributed data becomes available. 2.4 Review of VAERS forms, medical records, and automated tables for reports of interest • Daily priority reports will provide VAERS ID numbers and associated AESIs; these reports can be reviewed by VAERS personnel for initial information. • Daily line list will provide VAERS ID numbers, associated AESIs, and assigned medical abstractor names. Medical abstractors will then access the VAERS VPN, review available medical records, and complete abstraction using the internal abstraction website (Figure). o Data from these medical abstractions will be used for supplemental tables to provide additional information on the automated summary tables (i.e., the cumulative daily data described in section 2.2.1.) •
Freepers who doubt the significance of these historical covid vaccine numbers should take the time to click on this link (and add an extra 1,400 additional since April 24th) provided by
Jean Marc Benoit MD @JeanmarcBenoit
Emergency Physician, amateur covid data analyst. Clinical medicine, evidence-based medicine, data-based reporting·
Apr 24
“Vaccine suspected death reports in US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, from 1990 up to April 24, 2021.”
“Something is very wrong in 2021”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ezy8oOnWYAI0IiJ?format=png&name=medium
Flu vaccines are also mostly given to senior citizens. Last year 194 million people got the flu vaccine. 20 of them were “after vax deaths.”
And the following graph you will need to add 2,900 additional deaths so far.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ExGIFGeVgAQu0qz?format=jpg&name=900x900
On one sketchy website, I see that "Dr." Jessica Rose "Dr. Jessica Rose has a BSc in Applied Mathematics and completed her MSc in Immunology at Memorial University of Newfoundland in Canada. She completed her PhD in Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University and then did her first Post Doctorate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Molecular Biology."
Being a post-doc means she has little real-world research experience. I did find a paper in which she describes kinetics of drug mediated deactivation of human cytomegalovirus, but this is far removed from looking at safety data of drugs going through the regulatory approval pipeline. I doubt that she has ever analyzed clinical trial data or overseen any research conducted for the purpose of FDA approval. Her reading of VAERS is as naïve as any I have seen. If she had any experience in the regulatory world, she would know exactly what VAERS is: a reporting system for documenting adverse effects following vaccination, regardless of cause.
It takes statistical analysis to determine if any of the adverse events occur more frequently in the vaccinated group than in a similar unvaccinated group. Since the Covid-19 vaccine was first administered to seniors and to people with preexisting conditions, one can expect that adverse events occur with rather high frequency in this group. When I looked at the VAERS data, I saw that people died of heart attacks, strokes, etc.--which is not that unusual in elderly people. One woman was literally on her deathbed when she received the vaccine at her family's insistence.
Just looking at overall death data and comparing it to the deaths recorded in VAERS that occurred within a few days of Covid-19 vaccinations:
2,854,838 died in 2019, the US population is ~330,000,000, and there are 52 weeks per year: (2,854,838/330,000,000)/52 * 100 (to make a percent) = 0.01664% chance of dying per week.
4,063 deaths after Covid-19 vaccine are recorded in VAERS. So far, 279,196,860 doses have been administered. 4,063/279,196,860 * 100 = 0.001455% chance of dying from any cause after a Covid-19 shot.
So, if we were going to assume causative relationships here, you are 11 times more likely to die each week if you do not receive a Covid-19 vaccine than if you receive one.