Ok, THIS requires better explanation. Its hard enough already for a non-medical person to sift through all the information (and disinformation) to understand the pros/cons of the vaccines. Someone knowledgeable please explain THIS at a layman's level. How can we have allowed the 'contamination' 1/3 of our blood supplying population?
~~~~~~~~~~
I'll put my explanation from another thread below:
Not that I’m an expert, but I’ll try to pass along what I’ve heard from Vanden Bossche.
You have a broad array of antibodies which meet a wide variety of needs.
You get injected with a ‘shot’ that commandeers some cells and tells them to make Trillions (according to Tenpenny) of a spike protein that triggers the production of one or more specific antibodies (specific to that spike protein).
This new antibody (or these new antibodies) are designed to address just that one spike protein so they are narrower in scope.
Tenpenny, Vandenbossche seem to focus on the fact that no one controls how much of your overall antibody response will be ‘commandeered’ by the spike protein, telling an unknown, unlimited number of your body cells, “You were making all those other antibodies, stop making those and start making this one/these (for the ‘vaccine’ spike protein) which are more specific.”
So you are kind of terraforming your antibody production at an unknown rate for an unknown, possibly indefinite length of time.
Vanden Bossche believes that the vaccine’s targeted anti-body production will ‘out compete’ your natural immune response sufficiently, so that you would change how you respond to pathogens. While both groups of antibodies (natural and vaccinated) are present, the vaccinated would likel become predominate, which means that your antibody production would become less versatile to meet a diverse array of viruses/bacteria and could narrow down dramatically to focus on that spike protein.
They don’t know how narrow, for how long. They see no means by which the production of the spike protein could be controlled (Quantity etc.) so for them it’s ‘pedal-to-the-metal’ production of trillions of spike proteins whether you need them or not, and that would overwhelmed and commandeer production of other natural antibodies.
The Faucists are sensitive about the fact that the spike protein in the vaccine is not the same one as in Covid-19. They hide that and get angry if you say it’s different, because why would we want a spike protein that is different from the illness it is meant to treat.
It may be that spike protein addresses other coronaviruses too, all I’m saying is it can’t be identical and they have been acting like it is.
And then there was research that said, “Hey, the spike proteins themselves cause medical problems, severe ones that cross the blood-brain barrier...” and suddenly the same people were shrieking, “that’s not true! They’re different!” only they meant that the vax spike protein is missing part of the Covid spike that creates that medical problem...they claim. Their stories change with the news cycle, whatever is ‘needed’ abruptly becomes ‘known’.
So the person who said the ‘vaccine’ wipes out antibodies meant ‘broadspectrum naturally occuring antibodies’ are largely replaced with the unmodulated production of a narrower collection of antibodies.
This is also hush hush - very sensitive topic which triggers raves. There was a news report of a man who died following vaccination in which his doctors said he had different antibodies than the ones naturally occurring because he was vaccinated. BOY the censors nuked that story from orbit. That is so scrubbed! So that information is purged, and Faucists control the research (I think they patented Covid, too) so ‘the narrative’ doesn’t acknowledge the difference.
Because this information is forbidden/purged, the public is unaware the vaccine can permanently shift their immune system to become less capable, less robust, just by narrowing the different types of antibodies you can produce to really focus on a narrow group of pathogens.
Vanden Bossche was kind of emotional on this subject - what it means to do this to a population, to make it less able to respond to disease. He seemed particularly horrified for the children, that their immune systems would be hijacked (my words, not his) from normal development and trained to respond a certain way with a certain group of antibodies. I think he also said narrowing the collection of antibodies you can produce may mean that you encounter pathogens for which you can no longer produce sufficient antibodies - you just don’t mount an immune response at all because the vax aren’t the right antibodies and have commandeered your natural system so it doesn’t produce them anymore.
Thank you very much.