Somewhat backpedaling from “no effect on the disease”.
HIPAA notwithstanding, can you take a stab at the range of VitD blood levels in your patients? (I don’t know if you even bother with blood draws over the course of their treatment, so I won’t ask how it varies over time.)
Not really a backpedal. I think your analysis of a flaw in the study is correct. But the study itself purports no effect on the disease based on decreased levels of vitamin Dc if I misrepresented the article it was unintentional.