‘Any employer mandating their employee’s take unapproved or unlicensed medication is ILLEGAL.’
no more illegal than forcing people to wear face coverings against their will to shop in a store; but here in FReepland
that was hunky-dory because, well, private entity, no shirts, no shoes, no service all fine and dandy due to a private businessowner wanting things done his way in his store...
but I guess it’s different when it comes to a vaccine required by a private business owner, eh...?
The difference comes down to the various emergency powers given to the governors. When they invoke those powers, they are given a LOT of wiggle room to do things ... like mask mandates in many cases.
Not saying I agree with what they did, just pointing out that the peoples elected state reps have given their governors quit a bit of power when it comes to emergency declarations.
However, there are laws against mandating unlicensed and unapproved medication. If there weren't, there would be no requirement to have a medication go through the testing and approval/rejection process. A pharmaceutical company (for example) could make some new medication and simply mandate their employees take it as a condition of employment.