~~~~~~~~~~~~
renfrew: The J&J vaccine is that. It takes a common adenovirus that can at worst cause a minor cold and modifies it so that it looks enough like COVID that you immune system will track both down.
ransomnote: I'm sorry, that's false. There is nothing traditional about the J&J vaccine.
The J&J uses a piece of DNA which, once injected, directs the production of mRNA that tells cells to make the spike protein. The Prizer and Moderna inject a pieceof mRNA that tells cellsl to make the spike protein.
China supposedly made the traditional 'attenuated virus' version (deactivated Covid-19 virus) to build immunity. Isn't that strange?
China gave our vaccine companies the genome of the Covid-19 virus but it didn't build the genome from the live virus. China used software that predicted the missing pieces of genome by patching in prior Coronavirus genome sequences. That technique can't be accurate for Covid as this virus is declared to be 'novel'.
China did all this work for us, using the wrong technology, while Moderna and others waited for them, and then released what it says is the genome. Then China made their own vaccine from the live virus instead. Hmmmm... So China gave us the virus, and then it claims it gave us the true genome for the virus for us to build our vaccines and PCR test upon. China Virus/China Vaccines - gee China likes to help, huh?
Like all viruses, including cowpox, it does this by getting into some of your cells and modifying them. The mRNA vaccines skip directly to this step. The important thing is the only cells it is modifying are a handful of muscle cells in your arm.
No, there is 'leakage' from the injection site. Israel found harm to all body systems resulting from vaccines and while theirs was Pfizer, the principle is the same, the damage isn ot confined to the injection site.
Israeli People Committee’s Report Find Catastrophic Side Effects Of Pfizer Vaccine To Every System In Human Body
Besides, the spike protein has been identified as being harmful in an of itself. Oh the vax companies and Faucists are denying the research - all we have to do is trust them.
Say, why did the CDC and Faucists all decide to use a PCR 'test' that doesn't identify the Covid virus or the presence of illness from the Covid virus? Why did they choose a test and run it at 45 cycles so it had a 97% false positive rate. Why aren't they trying to make an accurate test? It's almost like they want to control the narrative or something.
COVID, even with the best treatments, gets everywhere and is modifying cells throughout your body, which is why it causes such diverse symptoms.
No, that's propaganda. Most of illnesses last year were flu and some were WuHu flu and we dont' know who's who because the PCR doesn't identify Covid.
Dr. McCullough specializes in treating Covid-19 patients and he says he and his team created a protocol (described in link below) that cuts Covid-19 death among the most vulnerable (age/comorbidites) by 85% and he says nothing about lasting damage. In fact, he's concerned about the unacceptably high levels of damage among those vaccinated.
COVID Vaccine Killing Huge Numbers, Warns Leading Doctor – Liberty Sentinel [32 minute video]
Normally, a vaccine would be pulled LONG before we had the number of deaths VAERS reports for COvid-19 vaccines, and VAERS only has less than 25% of reports of harm the CDC has received.
The J&J Is possibly more weaponized than the mRNA. It uses a splice of bat genome, which our bodies have never seen, and includes stealth (splice of HIV), and a crippled adenovirus (common cold). The cold virus is a problem because those getting the J&J can also have colds. The live cold can mix with the vaccine genom and then the vaccine would become airborne with the capaicty to spread of the common cold.
All the Covid 'vaccines' have problems that can be severe - people overlook them and focus on 'death'. Here's a table for Thrombocytopenia - I've made others for cardiac, paralysis, anaphylaxis and stroke.
I sorted CDC VAERS reports for all vaccines to see how the Covid vaccines compare with prior vaxs. They are at the top of the list, and that list has been built over the course of 30 years.
The data below is valid for 5/14/2021 and is strictly for the word "Thrombocytopenia" in the event description field for all vaccines in VAERS. Covid vax's appear at the top because in their few months of administration, they have so many instances.
You run all these risks and more, and you have to incur these risks again (compounding them) everytime you get a booster shot, which they are already proposing. Oh, and the CDC has ruled that booster 'vaccines' for Covid will not have to go through testing. Even if the pharmas are being honest about efficacy (*cough**cough*), they protect so little and only have data for 2 month tests. So they don't know how many got Covid a week after the 2 month trial - the trials were too short.
Check Your Understanding Of The "Efficacy" Claims For 'Vaccines': The Claim "95% Effective" Means A Fraction Of 1% Of The Vaccinated Are "Protected" For 2 Months
The CDC and pharmas knew more harm could result and never told the public.
From the start, Faucists/CDC/Pharma should have been talking about potential risks. Instead they purge/censor/cancel anyone who speaks of the risks.
Last October, researchers determined that the known risk of ADE were not being explained to the public.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
"Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."