Skip to comments.
Prince Harry Slams the First Amendment as 'Bonkers'
NN ^
| 05-15-21
| Jay Greenberg
Posted on 05/15/2021 10:03:13 AM PDT by McQ444
Britain's Prince Harry has slammed the First Amendment, claiming the idea of free speech is "bonkers." Speaking during an appearance on the ‘Armchair Experts’ podcast hosted by Dax Shepard, Harry, the Duke of Sussex, began the interview by blasting comedian and commentator Joe Rogan.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
TOPICS: Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 1of; 1stamendment; blogpimp; bot; daxshepard; deportprinceharry; didyousearch; epsteininlaw; freespeech; harrymarkle; postandrun; princeharry; princessharry; roralgrifters; royalinbred; undesirablealien; unitedkingdom; whocares; zotthekeywordtroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 next last
To: McQ444
Harry’s free speech is ok.
Those who critizes him...not ok
101
posted on
05/15/2021 12:38:54 PM PDT
by
South Dakota
(Patriotism is the new terrorism)
To: McQ444
ok...lets play his game...Prince harry shut the hell up you are an idiot and have right to voice this opinion. at this point the only answer to your breach is house arrest and being banned from polite company.
102
posted on
05/15/2021 12:40:46 PM PDT
by
PCPOET7
(`)
To: McQ444
What state is Prince Harry from?
103
posted on
05/15/2021 12:59:10 PM PDT
by
HIDEK6
(God bless Donald Trump. )
To: McQ444
104
posted on
05/15/2021 12:59:57 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: nutmeg
105
posted on
05/15/2021 1:00:46 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
(God bless you and thank you, Rush)
To: McQ444
Harry, if you don't like the first amendment, we will change it, because we want moronic royals to be happy... 😀
Or you can't Go F Yourself. I still believe Archie is still the smartest of you 3...
106
posted on
05/15/2021 1:16:12 PM PDT
by
Deplorable American1776
(Rest In PEACE, Rush H. Limbaugh III. You are missedhe t already...)
To: McQ444
What a total pratt. Reinforcing my fairly general dislike of the Brits.
This kind anyway. Over privileged layabout.
107
posted on
05/15/2021 1:18:32 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
(America. Founded by geniuses . Now governed by idiots.)
To: PghBaldy
108
posted on
05/15/2021 1:19:00 PM PDT
by
jmacusa
(America. Founded by geniuses . Now governed by idiots.)
To: McQ444
Limey bastard needs to take himself and his whore back to Britain, then.
109
posted on
05/15/2021 1:25:30 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
There used to be scuttlebutt that Liz II was going to skip her children and pass the crown to one of her grandkids. It will of course be up to Parliament to decide the succession for the United Magic Kingdom fantasy castle.
110
posted on
05/15/2021 1:26:13 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: McQ444
Why.....this is breaking news!!! For immediate release!! Wow! How extremely important! How great in content! Wow! What a masterpiece of composition!!! What.....what....what, well it's something that is for sure! Why, I'm astounded at then lack of coverage this has received! It deserves all the honor and celebrity one can give it!
Wow! This is really a ground breaking statement! "bonkers" Wow! Too bad this tuft isn't important to anyone.
Go home stooge. Don't blame us for your tramp! We thought we'd gotten rid of her pawning her off on you! You idiot! I'm sure your grandmother must be proud. Poor woman.
To: McQ444
claiming the idea of free speech is “bonkers.”
Well then Harry, STFU and surrender your free speech.
To: Cecily
Personally I think the royal twit meant to say the Second Amendment.
Harry is really that ignorant.
He can’t stay on script.
To: McQ444
Whever “Prince” Harry - I thought he had divorced himself from the royal family or was that one of his lies - opens his mouth, he manages to say something stupid.
114
posted on
05/15/2021 2:34:39 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Right Brigade
Well whatever he meant, our Constitution is none of his business.
115
posted on
05/15/2021 5:03:17 PM PDT
by
Cecily
To: McQ444
I am sick to death of that little red headed b****.
Pack up and go home!
116
posted on
05/15/2021 5:24:50 PM PDT
by
Irenic
( )
To: McQ444
Ans why are we calling this a$$hole ‘prince’?????
117
posted on
05/15/2021 6:48:27 PM PDT
by
eeriegeno
(A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State....)
To: MuttTheHoople
Draw? Britain didn’t want the war in the first place, she had already conceded on the impressment issue but the US went ahead with the war anyway because they hoped to be able to kick the British out of North America, when that failed America ended up fighting a defensive war trying to stop Britain rampaging all the way through US territory having expected to fight a quick and easy victory in annexing Canada.
If you start a war hoping to make territorial gains and you end up with the status quo ante bellum, I think that counts as a loss.
To: Grampa Dave
Then, we should have let the Germans handle the Brits in WWI and II. If we stayed out of the former we could have avoided the latter.
119
posted on
05/16/2021 6:58:53 AM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
To: McQ444
If he was referring to what it’s become today he’s absolutely right.
120
posted on
05/16/2021 7:06:05 AM PDT
by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson