You're utterly and irretrievably WRONG.
But there’s a doctor on the faculty of Harvard Med School, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, whom one of his colleagues described as one of the top 3 people in the world on vaccine reactions.
He got thrown OFF the CDC advisory committee, for wanting to continue with the JNJ jabs, and not pause them.
A VAXXER.
Harvard Med.
Advising the CDC.
Got that?
He says that these jabs should be reserved for the over-70 crowd, since they need them the most, AND that they suffer far fewer coagulopathies from the jabs, than younger people. He says there is no medical reason to give these shots to teenagers.
But Pfizer said that they see the injections and boosters as a significant source of revenue going forward, even as they are pushing to give the injections to children as young as 12.
Since I made that comment I watched the interview of some doc on Tucker Carlson, and I agree with you I was mistaken about the immune boosting properties of the vaccines. This particular doc also said IIRC vaccines should be given to those over 60. The idea seems to be that weaker immune systems need the vaccines, but they could be harmful to those with stronger immune systems.
The link to the interview was given to me when I asked for more data. That wasn't the answer, and of course, nobody has supplied the data. Not you, not anyone. The data I want is the numbers of strokes and other blood clotting events per million people per day. Sometimes people will post the nunbers for vaccinees instead of just posting anecdotes. But they never post the "compared to" numbers.
Compared to what? We have 2 million vaccinations per day (was 3 million in early April) How many clotting events are expected in 2 million people each day?