You quite obviously have no scientific training.
Have you ever developed a PCR assay? Run a PCR reaction? Used PCR for anything? Can you describe exactly how a PCR reaction works? Do you have any idea why PCR reaction results become questionable when you run the reaction for more cycles?
Are you aware that one cannot patent a naturally occurring organism, protein, nucleic acid sequence, etc.? If you would have read the entire patent that you linked, you would know that there is no patent on SARS-1. On page 72, the last page of the patent, it states exactly what was patented: kits and methods for detection of SARS-1. As for the expiration of the patent in 2017, it probably was not renewed because SARS-1 disappeared and there is no possibility of making a profit by selling SARS-1 PCR kits.
Seriously, helping to spread misinformation helps no one, and has a great potential to cause harm.
“…Seriously, helping to spread misinformation helps no one, and has a great potential to cause harm.”
************************************
Well, spreading misinformation is what she/he/it does. It’s all she/he/it does.
You quite obviously have no scientific training.
Have you ever developed a PCR assay? Run a PCR reaction? Used PCR for anything? Can you describe exactly how a PCR reaction works? Do you have any idea why PCR reaction results become questionable when you run the reaction for more cycles?
Are you aware that one cannot patent a naturally occurring organism, protein, nucleic acid sequence, etc.? If you would have read the entire patent that you linked, you would know that there is no patent on SARS-1. On page 72, the last page of the patent, it states exactly what was patented: kits and methods for detection of SARS-1. As for the expiration of the patent in 2017, it probably was not renewed because SARS-1 disappeared and there is no possibility of making a profit by selling SARS-1 PCR kits.
Seriously, helping to spread misinformation helps no one, and has a great potential to cause harm.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kary Mullis said the PCR test he created was not useful in determining whether or not someone had any kind of disease. He explained it was a research tool, and my paraphrase of his explanation is that his invention was used to exaggerate (amplify) tiny amounts of material that would otherwise be overlooked in a sample.
National File ^ | March 15, 2021 | Patrick Howley
(...) Kary Mullis, who won a 1993 Nobel Prize for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing process later used to diagnose Coronavirus cases, said that Dr. Anthony Fauci lacks knowledge of medicine and is willing to lie on television. Mullis also admitted in another set of videotaped remarks that a PCR test “doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.” (...)
03/15/2021 10:44:41 PM PDT · by SecAmndmt · 41 replies
For this reason, the PCR test can identify fragments of viruses that were defeated before the person ever beacme ill. It can identify inactive fragments in someone who was sick from a respiratory disease (including flu) 2 months ago.
It also tests positive for fruit, goats, Coca Cola and "Spanish Water" because it's not detecting live viruses, it's basically detecting chains of molecules that can be present in many different substances.
Given that you consistently claim to have medical expertise, and you consistently work to distort and deflect from the truth, I conclude you post to intentionally conceal the truth from the public, which is not helpful at all, is it?