You quite obviously have no scientific training.
Have you ever developed a PCR assay? Run a PCR reaction? Used PCR for anything? Can you describe exactly how a PCR reaction works? Do you have any idea why PCR reaction results become questionable when you run the reaction for more cycles?
Are you aware that one cannot patent a naturally occurring organism, protein, nucleic acid sequence, etc.? If you would have read the entire patent that you linked, you would know that there is no patent on SARS-1. On page 72, the last page of the patent, it states exactly what was patented: kits and methods for detection of SARS-1. As for the expiration of the patent in 2017, it probably was not renewed because SARS-1 disappeared and there is no possibility of making a profit by selling SARS-1 PCR kits.
Seriously, helping to spread misinformation helps no one, and has a great potential to cause harm.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kary Mullis said the PCR test he created was not useful in determining whether or not someone had any kind of disease. He explained it was a research tool, and my paraphrase of his explanation is that his invention was used to exaggerate (amplify) tiny amounts of material that would otherwise be overlooked in a sample.
National File ^ | March 15, 2021 | Patrick Howley
(...) Kary Mullis, who won a 1993 Nobel Prize for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing process later used to diagnose Coronavirus cases, said that Dr. Anthony Fauci lacks knowledge of medicine and is willing to lie on television. Mullis also admitted in another set of videotaped remarks that a PCR test “doesn’t tell you that you’re sick.” (...)
03/15/2021 10:44:41 PM PDT · by SecAmndmt · 41 replies
For this reason, the PCR test can identify fragments of viruses that were defeated before the person ever beacme ill. It can identify inactive fragments in someone who was sick from a respiratory disease (including flu) 2 months ago.
It also tests positive for fruit, goats, Coca Cola and "Spanish Water" because it's not detecting live viruses, it's basically detecting chains of molecules that can be present in many different substances.
Given that you consistently claim to have medical expertise, and you consistently work to distort and deflect from the truth, I conclude you post to intentionally conceal the truth from the public, which is not helpful at all, is it?
"11. The PCR tests do not detect SARS-CoV-2 particles, but particles from any number of viruses you might have contracted in the past, and that a lawsuit for crimes against humanity is being launched by a German attorney for this fraud.
Even Fauci admits PCR tests don't work. The WHO backs him up. In this CDC document), testing guidelines state that false negatives and positives are possible - page 39.
The PCR test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens - page 40. But most importantly, on page 1, SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated in the first instance: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA".
Neither the CDC can provide samples of SARS-CoV-2, nor can Stanford and Cornell labs, and in a CNN interview Fauci said he was not getting tested and there is no need to test asymptomatic people. No Jab For Me"
Sometimes I've seen a vax company or other researcher claim they used the live virus but it's not an isolated sample, which is the only sample capable of proving that Covid responded a certain way to specific conditions.
I've seen assertions that isolated samples were used - but usually quickly find that NIH funded the research etc.
I posted about the fact that the PCR had a hideous false positive rate, and an unknown rate of false negatives:
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives (freerepublic.com)
Because the truth coming from a former Chief Science Officer at Pfizer was hard to take, the source was attacked as a 'former employee' as if he were naturally "disgruntled' and lying.
So then I posted about how wildly successful he was licensing and developing drugs licensed from Pfizer after he was no longer employed there.
Turning Pfizer Discards Into Novartis Gold: The Story Of Ziarco
I went looking to see if this inaccurate test was used in the 'vaccine' trials and of course, it was. Moderna specifies that a person in their trial would be 'diagnosed' with Covid-19 if they had a positive PCR test and at least one symptom, however Covid-19 shares symptoms with other respiratory illnesses.
Pfizer was coy about using the PCR. It specified its results were based on 'laboratory testing'. Pfizer seemed to know that at some point, the PCR test would be exposed so they I had to look through several documents and find the original filing to discover they used the PCR, but in that documented employed the inventor's original name for the assay (the inventor didn't consider it a test).
Based on the realization that isolated samples are not available, and were not used to develop the test that supposedly detects the illness in people, I wondered how the vaccine developers could say anything about their lab results, which should be scrambled as to who has what illness (flu, likely) and when they had it (all those false positives).
I came to the conclusion the vaccine trial data is likely fake to some degree. Moderna hadn't released large portions of raw data when I first started looking, and the editor of a British medical journal was working with the scraps of data released and, at the time, said 'efficacy' was much lower than claimed.
I don't believe what they have told us.
How can we believe what they say about the flu vax, or anything else? I've discovered that the CDC has a Foundation to which George Soros and Bill Gates (largest donor) contribute, and the board of the foundation includes former ambassadors to the UN and EU. What could possibly go wrong?
exDemMom, House Atreides, gas_dr, et al. are all in on the plandemic narrative that has been forced down everyones throat for political, financial and tyranny reasons. They are invested in the lie and will not get off of it.