A claim that mRNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles suspected of crossing the blood-brain barrier are the cause three blood clots in and near the brain is equivalent to a claim that an mRNA injection caused a car accident?
Yours would appear to be logical fallacy #19 (Non-sequitur).
You’re welcome.
1. Ad Hominem: see Attack the person
2. Ad Antiquitatem: see Appeal to Tradition
3. Ad Baculum: see Appeal to Fear
4. Ad Hominem Tu Quoque: See Personal Inconsistency
5. Ad Ignorantium: see Argument from Ignorance
6. Ad Metum: see Appeal to Fear
7. Ad Misericordiam: see Appeal to Pity
8. Ad Nauseum: see Repetition
9. Ad Novitam: see Appeal to Novelty
10. Ad Numeram: see Appeal to Common Practice
11. Ad Populum: see Appeal to Common Belief or Bandwagon
12. Ad Ridiculum: see Appeal to Ridicule
13. Ad Verecundiam: see Appeal to Authority
14. Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: see False Cause
15. Dicto Simpliciter: see Accident
16. Ignoratio Elenchi: see Missing the Point
17. In Terrorem: see Appeal to Fear
18. Non Causa Pro Causa: see False Effect
19. Non Sequitur: See Affirming the Consequent, Denying the Antecedent or Missing the Point.
20. Petitio Principii: see Begging the Question
21. Plurium Interrogationum: see Many Questions
22. Post Hoc: X follows Y. Therefore X is caused by Y.
23. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc: see Post Hoc
24. Reductio ad Absurdum: A false X is silly, so X is true.
25. Secundum quid et simpliciter: see In a Certain Respect and Simply
This is a Chinese bioweapon.
The Chinese gave the genetic sequence for the spike protein used in the jabs, right?
A Chinese PhD Thesis Sheds Important New Light On The Origin of the COVID-19 Coronavirus
The Massive Infiltration of U.S. Virus Research by China’s Military