I don’t know if the vaccines are safe or not. But we all deserve honest information. I’m rather sure this article is a distortion. The linked article quotes research from the Salk Institute. So I went to the original Salk Institute article.
The Salk article talks about the virus itself, and NOT about the vaccines. From that article:
“Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive “spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself.”
The Vaxxter article can’t have it both ways. They say that the vaccines might be dangerous (and maybe they are). But then they cite as evidence a Salk study that does not say that.
Which honest information should have started with informing every person who had a PCR test of how many replications were used before it got a positive result. Then statistics should’ve been kept with all of this data.
In the United States such a huge number of amplifications was used in many of the tests that the numbers of positives is greatly inflated. Then any deaths that resulted after a person had a positive test are counted as a COVID-19 death even if the c-virus had nothing to do with a death from cancer or heart disease etc.
You are correct. The Vaxter headline does not match what the Salk article states and then it conflates the terms covid and vaccine. I consider it, like a democrat, willful and misleading use of language.
I don't, but is seems relevant
The mRNA injections prompt the body to produce spike protein and express it on the surface of cells; the spike protein directly causes problems even without the virus present, based on published experimental work.