I ignore what I think is too stupid an assertion that only an idiot would swallow it.
This is the second time you’ve mentioned “shed” of the vaccine.
Is this bizarre “vaccine shedding” idea really popular with you extreme anti-vaxxers??
That can’t happen...
From a thread about the REJECTION of a Sputnik V batch that DID allow replication of the adenovirus used...
https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1387397186372005893
“E1/E3 deletions are standard in Ad-vectors. Deleting E1 prevents the virus from replicating and deleting E3 prevents it from interacting with the immune system.
...
When making adenovirus-vectored vaccines, once you’ve deleted a region of the genome, it doesn’t just reappear out of nowhere. The presence of replicating virus suggests E1 was either not deleted or it recombined during manufacturing with a full length AdV genome.”
"...When making adenovirus-vectored vaccines, once you’ve deleted a region of the genome, it doesn’t just reappear out of nowhere. The presence of replicating virus suggests E1 was either not deleted or it recombined during manufacturing with a full length AdV genome.”
That indicates there was a batch out there, where the folks doing the prep, messed up and failed to take out sections from the viral genome before putting it into the adenovirus.
Look at that bit in YOUR post about "it recombined during the manufacturing": this indicates that recombination with other viruses is possible, to REGAIN function carefully removed.
If it can do that in vitro in what is certainly a more carefully controlled environment than outside the lab, it can do it in vivo too.
Also, if it can be done by accident, it can certainly be done under-the-table on purpose, say, by not disabling the adenovirus genome on purpose before splicing in the coof spike-coding segments.
How do we know the clowns behind this are *honest*? They've certainly lied and cheated about everything else under the sun.
The shedding is of the spike protein, and it can happen.
It is not shedding of the adenovirus.
Are you being obtuse, or really didn’t get that?
You might want to tell all the scientists posting peer-reviewed papers about the phenomenon that it's a "bizarre" idea:
I copied the above, enlarged it, printed it out, and have it hanging on the wall above the computer. So many big words, so close together... I have no idea what it means, but as abstract art, it is a masterpiece.