Replies

So which conspiracy theory kook site did these come from? Wherever they came from, you can send them back.

US10/822,904 (US7220852B1) is a method for detecting the original SARS 2003 virus, keying off a specific nucleotide sequences found only in that virus. It’s a detection method.

US46592703P same thing.
US7776521B1 same thing.

Look at the dates on these. All of them predate the SARS-CoV-2 virus’s discovery by years or over a decade.

You think you’re so very clever, but what you bring me is copy-pasted nonsense from some stupid conspiracy website that neither you nor they understand. It’s not even for the right virus.

What a joke.

My god, you’re desperate.

I can tell by your bluster.

patents.google.com

If you were honest instead of desperate, you’d have noticed I pointed out

a) the original link was not to the Virus itself, but some of the links down the page were
b) the links down the page SAID human coronavirus, but pointed at the same thing
c) I pointed out myself, that the patents were not current.

I know they predate the SARS-CoV-2 by years; the story told by others, is that people saw the earlier virus, realized the potential for having the patent on such a virus that was suitable for manipulation, and swooped down on the patents.

If you were an honest person (you’re not), you’d have put that together with the other articles which just came out on the gain-of-function research being done in the lab, based on scientific discussions of the changes at the individual amino acid level at the binding site; showing how it is almost impossible for it to have arisen naturally; he considered the way spot mutations happen (scattered, rather than successive codons/amino acids, and keeping in mind the differing codons for a specific amino acid in humans compared to other species); and how gene swaps happen, which don’t fit this new virus either; or by looking at how there were no intermediate infections in humans, and the new virus cannot infect its supposed old host species; and discussing two different common laboratory techniques which would be easy to use to transition the base virus through the gain-of-function process to bind to and infect human cells...

and said, yeah, it’s a fair cop. Or at least plausible.

HINT: did you think people wouldn’t notice the similarities in the name SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2?

Incidentally, what happened to your rolodex; surely you can call people at CDC or Pfizer or JNJ or Moderna or AstraZeneca and get put through, and ask the lawyers yourself for the patent numbers; assuming for the nonce you don’t happen to have them at your fingertips already.

It’s fun watching the walls fall in on you as more and more MDs are demonstrating and publishing the mechanisms by which these mRNA injections hurt people.