” Rhetorical setup by me. Trap SPRUNG.”
You think you’re so clever. It’s adorable.
“What is the death rate by age cohort from COVID?”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
“But the young don’t get infected as often.”
You have no evidence of this. The available evidence is that younger people (particularly children) are more often asymptomatic, which means they would never even know they had it based on outward symptoms. There’s no evidence that I’ve seen that says they don’t become infected as often.
“You need to compare, age segment-by age-segment, BMI-quintile by BMI-quintile, the risks of death from catching covid, and the risks from the jabs.”
Each individual should be doing that for themselves. I’m not making medical decisions for other people; they’re doing so for themselves. That’s called being a responsible adult.
“Except that the jabs SPECIFICALLY HAVVE NOT BEEN STUDIED for the youth, or pregnant women.”
They’re being studied right now for the youth. I hear a lot of objections for the fact that clinical trials are proceeding for children, but that’s literally how every medicine intended for all age groups is tested: first on adults, then on younger and younger groups of children. That’s how we know what’s safe to give to young children: it was tested. And clinical trials are almost never performed on pregnant women, and for very good reason. Rather, the data is collected from women who either became pregnant while taking the medication or who chose to take it while pregnant. The data collected so far from thousands of woman says that the COVID-19 vaccines cause ZERO problems for pregnant women or their babies. (https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2020/12/vaccinating-pregnant-and-lactating-patients-against-covid-19)
From the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: “no differences have been seen when comparing pregnant women participating in the v-safe pregnancy registry with the background rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes.”
“that’s just going by the published stats from VAERS”
Except according to the people who operate VAERS: “The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event.” - Guide to Interpreting VAERS Data (https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html)
So you are misusing VAERS data.
“No, you fascist. (Fascism is “govt.-private partnership” to take over people’s lives.)”
Well I guess that makes you, what? Anti-fascist?
Thank you for calling yourself out as Antifa. Have fun burning a major US city to the ground next time you get together with your buddies.
Which means if they're not even sick enough to notice, they're not DYING. Which tends to be noticeable, even to medical geniuses like you.
I don't think you noticed, btw, but you just holed your own argument beneath the waterline.
If they don't get sick enough to notice, why jab them with an untested, experimental agent whose long term effects are unknown, but which is rapidly (by VAERS death rate) proving more unsafe than any prior vaccination in US history? Remember the MD earlier with over 600 literature citations to his credit, who pointed out that prior *real* vaccinations got pulled after 25 deaths reported.
The mRNA is over 3000 in the States, and over 3000 in Europe, even with the slow-walking into VAERS, like the FBI avoiding Hunter's laptop.
Well I guess that makes you, what? Anti-fascist?
Thank you for calling yourself out as Antifa. Have fun burning a major US city to the ground next time you get together with your buddies.
Counterexample: Gen George S. Patton fought Nazis. So did Bomber Harris. They burned *foreign* cities.