Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “You cut-and-pasted my own statement that it was a bioweapon (which agrees with the article) and a few sentences later have the GALL to say “clearly I don’t agree with the central premise of the original article”.”

Simple yes or no answer. Do you agree with the “5 Doctors”: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”, or not?

If you agree with the 5 Doctors, then you’ll need to explain how at least four ‘Big Pharma’ companies were coerced into incorporating a bioweapon designed to kill people in all of their vaccines.
If you agree with the 5 Doctors, then you’ll need to explain why at least four ‘Big Pharma’ decided that it was in their best interest to kill their customers.
If you disagree with the 5 Doctors, then you’ll have to agree that this article is typical anti-vaxxer propaganda.


281 posted on 05/01/2021 7:24:29 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
Sod off. It's not a "Yes or No" question; I can agree partway with them; that it's a bioweapon, but not designed for mass death.

I've explained that in other posts already.

Which means your other questions are bullfeathers, just likie everything thing else about you.

The lie you Chicom Trolls and other propagandists keep trying to spread, is that if there is a conspiracy, that implies that every last person connected with the testing, manufacture, promotion, or distribution of the jabs MUST be fully informed about all aspects of the conspiracy.

That's not how it works, even with legitimate enterprises where there is no secret. Only a few at the top need know; the rest of the people just do what their boss tells them to.

Secondly, you're assuming that the jabs were designed as a bioweapon, knowing it to be a bioweapon, by big pharma.

And that doesn't have to be true either.

The VIRUS could have been designed as a bioweapon, with the virus being a key component of morbidity/mortality, and that knowledge not passed on by the Chicoms; and the rest of the manufacturers of the jabs, in haste because of fame and money, not looking a gift horse in the mouth when the Chinese offered the genetic sequence to make the spike, or suggested that the spike would be a good thing to target with jabs.

My god you are an ineffectual troll.

285 posted on 05/01/2021 8:26:33 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke
Simple yes or no answer.

Simple yes or no answer. Have you stopped double-dating with Hunter Biden?

See how the dishonest loaded questions work, troll-boi?

287 posted on 05/01/2021 8:27:47 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

To: DugwayDuke
Simple yes or no answer. Do you agree with the “5 Doctors”: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”, or not?

Hey, you lying sack of Flaming Fauci pellets, suck on this.

Former HEAD of MI6 says Covid-19 likely came from a lab

If it came from a lab, it was NOT natural.

The inference is obvious.

308 posted on 05/02/2021 9:02:01 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson