Posted on 04/29/2021 2:51:29 PM PDT by ransomnote
(h/t Holly B)
Many of us have read that the adverse effects of the 'vaccines' were being transmitted from vaccinated women, to unvaccinated women.
This excerpt from page 69 of Pfizer's documentation may explain the reports I've read.
Pfizer's documentations explains that 'occupational exposure' (to the vax) could occur if some people come into contact with a trial participant, which may or may not result in an adverse event (for the unvaxxed) and if an AE should occur, the data is to be kept outside the study report.
I suspect this is a feature, not a bug, in case people rejected the vaccine. I recommend all download the linked PDF if interested, before it undergoes 'revision'.
8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure
“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.
When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”
If we do not try to edify our brothers we bear some responsibility for their demise.
Granted, it’s small. And we gave it our best shot.
“Anyone who got the shot need to quarantine themselves. I don’t want that crap in me”
**********************************************************
Sadly, as of 6:00am this morning, about 54.9% of all American adults have now been vaccinated. Since you’re in a dwindling minority, your best bet is to, at all times, wear a sign asking all COVID-19 vaccinated to keep away from you. To call attention to yourself and your sign, consider wearing a highly reflective tin-foil hat at all times.
I sincerely wish you success in avoiding those of us who have been vaccinated.
I read this elsewhere,
Those whom are vaxxer
are new spreaders.
.
Chinas first Strike
Continues,,,
Hopefully, most will wear their I’ve been vax’d pins.
Ha! You suggest tin foil hats.
Maybe, those who’ve received the shots should wear their pins...since they’re so proud of this *accomplishment*.
we’re due to take my crazy MIL , age 91, for her second shot....are we in danger?....how does this vaccine effect get transmitted?...air?
Don’t laugh! Look how many (even, possibly, those you know) who’ve already taken these experimental shots. What....50%?
I sincerely wish you success in avoiding those of us who have been vaccinated.
I sincerely wish the “vaccinated” all the best.
However, I think they made a huge, irreversible mistake.
Good luck to you.
“we’re due to take my crazy MIL , age 91, for her second shot....are we in danger?....how does this vaccine effect get transmitted?...air?”
*********************************
It radiates from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated. You’ll need to keep at least 2 inches of lead shielding between your MIL and yourself.
Alternatively, you could simply recognize the truth that the anti-vaxxers are simply trying to frighten people with insane conspiracy promotions.
“Study Intervention” does not equal “Vaccine Test Subject”. In fact, the term “vaccine test subject doesn’t even appear in the linked document. Instead, the word “Participant” is used. Reading through the linked doc, it’s clear “study intervention” is synonymous with “vaccine candidate”. The term is used hundreds of times in the document, always referring to the vaccine:
“Study Intervention Name: RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines”
“participants receiving at least 1 dose of study intervention,”
“first dose of study intervention”
“second dose of study intervention”
“administer study intervention”
“at least 4 hours after study intervention administration”
“Study Intervention: BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine”
“at the following time points after receipt of study intervention: 7 and 21 days after Dose 1; 7 and 14 days and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after Dose 2”
“In participants receiving at least 1 dose of study intervention”
“An intervention is defined as a manipulation of the subject or subject’s environment for the purpose of modifying one or more health-related biomedical or behavioral processes and/or endpoints. Examples include: drugs/small molecules/compounds; biologics; devices; procedures (e.g., surgical techniques); delivery systems (e.g., telemedicine, face-to-face interviews); strategies to change health-related behavior (e.g., diet, cognitive therapy, exercise, development of new habits); treatment strategies; prevention strategies; and, diagnostic strategies.”
Sorry of that deflates your fun balloon.
Evil madman Bill Gates Depopulation link
https://youtu.be/SF6Ev_EXg9w
Ahhhh yes......of course, the anti-vaxxers scream it’s their right not to get vaccinated (and I agree) but now they’re building a faux case to stop people who want to get vaccinated from getting injected.
The games people play. Indeed.
Ahhhh yes......of course, the anti-vaxxers scream it’s their right not to get vaccinated (and I agree) but now they’re building a faux case to stop people who want to get vaccinated from getting injected.
The games people play. Indeed.
then go hide u see your bed. There is no conceivable way to transfer vaccine from vaccinated to unvaccinated
not this crap again
This refers to the situation where someone accidentally jabs themselves with a study needle. Its typically a nurse or doc or pharmacist who are administering the study meds. Those people are not study participants so anything that happens is recorded separately from the study data.
Sorry of that deflates your fun balloon.
~~~~~~~~~~~
You are intentionally distorting the content. Why?
It’s a never ending river of crap! 🙀
Just More Confusion
about Wuhan Flu.
Mariner to ransomnote
“Adverse event to the vaccine transmitted from vaccinated to unvaccinated.”
It does not say that clearly, whether they meant to or not.
Just sayin’, in the interest of clarity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your comment does not contribute to clarity. VAERS is ‘vaccine adverse event report’. Adverse events are terms of reports following direct exposure to vaccination and they are defined by symptoms. So here they are not referring to exposure to Covid, which they would describe differently. Exposure of trial partipants to Covid-19 would naturally be part of the study and included in the documentation.
This is ‘occupational’ effecting people not vaccinated but having the adverse events normally recorded by trial participants.
When I was reading an article about shingles being reported as a “adverse event” from the vaccines there were some reports of unvaccinated people who had close contact with a vaccinated person getting shingles.
Of course that seemed highly unlikely to be connected. Shingles are a result of a latent herpes virus becoming active due to some kind of stress. But, someone posted a part of the Pfizer vax EMA submission where Pfizer listed inhalation or contact with the vax as a possible source of vax exposure.
Then I remembered the following news story from early March that I had posted here. I initially found it bizarre, too and even wondered if it might just be a result of a poor google translation of Hebrew to English...:-) But, it was real...they did mean “vaccinators”, not vaccine recipients.
“This is from a news report from March 8, 2021
The Israeli Ministry of Health has decided to investigate the effects of pericarditis among vaccinated people. The decision was made after reports of a number of infections in the membrane and heart muscle were discovered among vaccinators.”
“Yesterday (Wednesday) a meeting was held between officials in the hospitals and the Ministry of Health during which these phenomena were reported by some of the hospitals. In a directive sent to the administers of the hospitals by the Ministry they were asked to forward, as stated, a report of every incident of myocarditis discovered among the vaccinated and to forward the referral to the cardiology department of the hospital.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.