Posted on 04/25/2021 8:08:42 PM PDT by ransomnote
The CDC is far behind in publishing reports of adverse events it receives. As of April 6, only 25% of actual reports of adverse events were available in VAERS. In the past month as rate of vaccination increased, the CDC drastically reduced the rate that it now publishes received reports. This means that there may be at minimum four times the number of strokes published in VAERS already reported to the CDC.
Even though the CDC is underreporting adverse events for Covid-19 'vaccines' by simply not publishing them, the remaining reports which are published already account 11% of all adverse events in (30+ years of) VAERS after just 4 months of 'vaccine's' administration.
The Covid-19 vaccines are the 2nd largest group of reports in VAERS with 86,891 PUBLISHED reports, and this constitutes a mere fraction of what CDC has actually received.
Before Covid-19 emerged in 2020, Harvard conducted a study in which it determined that less than 1% of actual adverse reactions following vaccination are ever reported to the CDC.
With accounts of drastic medical staff reductions and supposedly overwhelming numbers of Covid-19 cases to deal with, what are the chances that medical staff have time to report deaths to VAERS even if they wanted to?
Many deaths following vaccination, particularly in nursing homes, and being dismissed as Covid-19 deaths when there is no evidence to support it.
An impassioned CNA tending to the elderly made an impassioned plea for the public to wake up and realize the elderly are 'dropping like flies' in response to the vaccination. When many of his clients abruptly died following vaccination, his supervisor dismissed the deaths as the result of a 'super spreader' depiste offering zero evidence.
"Covid-19" and 'superspreader' are convenient, default excuses to dismiss the actual impacts the Covid 'vaccines' on the elderly. Statements by family or staff as to the vibrant quality of life enjoyed by the patient which ended abruptly when vaccinated are dismissed with words like, "He was old..." and "It was her time..."
A thread on FR details the many reasons why cause of death is often not investigated, despite all the 'rules' involved, and that such determinations are largely a bueurocrtaic decision.
A Covid Death? The Bureaucracy Decides (freerepublic.com)
With abrupt deaths dismissed as natural causes or 'too hard to tell' or 'not enough resources to find out,' how many of other patients just might be experiencing strokes following vaccination which are then attributed to age?
Here's a patient record of stroke in VAERS:
| 93 years old | 15-30 days after vaccination | 1204231-1 | Suffered from a stroke on 4/3/21 from a blood clot in his brain stem. Prior to vaccine he was healthy and 100% independent, still drove, did grocery shopping, yard work, etc. Now he cannot move his left side and was placed on hospice as he has lost his will to eat, drink, or live. |
The data set I pulled from VAERS included all records containing 'stroke in the event description. All records containing 'stroke' in the adverse event description are shown here (freerepublic.com).
Some instances wherein a physician typed 'stroke ruled out,' or other neutral reference, likely occurred but those records which I reviewed (approximately 200) did not have more than 2 examples of that notation.
Further, there are other medical terms for stroke which I did not include in my search so some records are missing there.
There are many examples like this in VAERS for all ages, but particularly among the elderly, in which the account goes something like, "He was fine until she got the vaccine...." or "She was active and when I left the room. she was working on her puzzles and I came back and she was gone..."
[Note: You may want to review the record of strokes reported following vaccination (Covid-19, VAERS) I posted to FR here. I believe you'll be struck, as I was, by the number of times you see that overall, onset is relatively soon after vaccination.]
Deaths and inujries from strokes in the vaccinated elderly are too rapidly ignored by the CDC and others. The CDC will swiftly declare cause of death 'Covid-19' based on supposition without testing, or with a positive Covid-19 within 60 days of death, but reported cases of abrupt stroke within days of vaccination are deemed impossible to determine and dismissed as irrelevent.
Why are there so many published reports of strokes for Covid-19 Vaccines in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System? Here are the top 5 vaccines with the most published stroke records in VAERS.
886 of the total number of 2254 of adverse event description 'stroke' reported to VAERS are for Covid-19 'vaccines' (approx 5 records are not classified by manufacturer). That's 39% of all published reports of strokes for all vaccines in the VAERS database.
How can Covid-19 vaccination records amass 39% of event records with 'stroke' in 4 months of administration, even though VAERS is not publishing most of the Covid-19 vax reports it has received?
I routinely report on total deaths in VAERS, but it's clear upon reading the records that the medical staff often do not know what happens to their patient after transferred or discharged from the ER or facility. The deaths published in VAERS are likely unreliable and underreported.
The CDC is no longer making much effort to publish reports receives for Covid-19, but about a month ago, it was publishing 25% of them.
So the current count of 867 'stroke' references multiplied by a factor of (at extreme minium) 4 would yield 3,468 'stroke' instances reported to the CDC. This number is really too small because the CDC curtailed reporting and so the factor is now greater than 4. But let's work with 3468 'stroke' references for now.
Remember, less than 1% of vaccination adverse events was reported to VAERS before Covid-19 impacted staffing and resources. This likely means facilities said to be understaffed and overwhelmed are making a fraction of previous effort to report to VAERS now.
But let's use 1% to calculate how many strokes are likely occuring following vaccination to calculate how many strokes may be occurring following vaccination which are never reported to VAERS.
This could indicate, via very modest estimates, that 346,800 strokes overall following Covid-19 vaccinations.
I'm not saying the vaccinations are medically responsible, because no investigation has begun to gather any evidence that strokes are an issue at all. Since Fauci and 8 others at NIAID own patents in the Moderna vaccine, I don't believe any investigation will ever occur.
I'm not saying my estimates are not without error. The degree to which the CDC has decided not to spend money to hire data entry persons to update VAERS has no doubt contributed to the weaknesses of this kind of estimate. If the IRS 'fell behind' to the degree the CDC has 'fallen behind', I do believe the IRS would spend money on data entry resources to catch up, if only to collect taxe funds.
The CDC is verbose in its promises that when records of adverse events are received and reviewed, all necessary medical oversight occurs to determine if the events recorded have any bearing on the safety of the vaccine.
WHERE the CDC when it comes to strokes? Even f they disagree with my math, Covid-19 'vaccines' account for 39% of stroke records published in VAERS. The CDC knows its database is not up to date, and that many never report to VAERS.
I know. I know. I've been told many times that all untimely deaths are reported to VAERS or investigated (autopsy) by law, but it was not happening before, and it certainly isn't happening now (links above).
Personally I think my estimate of potentially 350,000 strokes occurring after Covid-19 vaccinations is both modest and defensible, given the circumstances. This estimate is meant to encompasses published, unpublished and unreported strokes following Covid-19 vaccination (e.g., 'he was old...'). Note that the CDC and others estimate that less than 800,000 strokes occur annually in the U.S.
How many would it take before the CDC takes an interest in finding out why published Covid vaccine adverse event reccords account for 36% of all strokes in VAER for all vaccines? Is the CDC interested in knowing that over 10% of all adverse event records (all symptoms) in VAERS are for Covid-19 vaccinations, or is that why the CDC curtailed publishing received reports in VAERS?
Forget the estimates and percentages. Is the existance of over 800 records with 'stroke' listed in the adverse events description getting ANY attention?
With no displayed interest in the records of strokes in VAERS for Covid-19 vaccines, I have little hope anyone will take an interest in the 747 records of anaphylaxis or any other significant injury. I suppose they don't want to contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy."
In clinical trials, people report all kinds of things after receiving a placebo (sugar pill or saline shot).
"This shot is experimental for a reason."
The COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States have all gone through Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials. Those trials had over 100,000 participants in them. The first clinical trials began over a year ago, with the first recipients getting their first doses back on March 16, 2020. The data collected from those trials and from real world application in countries around the world demonstrate that the vaccines are safe and effective.
"There is no liability to the makers for a reason."
Federal courts have not had any jurisdiction over civil cases involving vaccines since 1986. Quit acting like this is something new. That liability was shifted to the vaccine court because of all the nuisance suits trying to put vaccine makers out of business. Same kinds of nuisance suits the anti-gunners were filing.
"treatments for the virus are almost forbidden."
The only treatment that's been demonstrated to be effective is monoclonal antibody therapy, which is the same treatment President Trump got in the hospital when he had COVID-19. It's very much allowed. And it's in use. It just isn't a silver bullet that saves everyone; it merely reduces the death toll.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30383-7/fulltext
But I’ve seen — forgot to save — a couple of articles from India and China, of patients who presented with DVT, who upon examination had the characteristic ground-glass on lung X-rays, yet had never manifested pulmonary symptoms.
To your point, Cathi posted this a few days ago, touching on the vaccine not all staying locally at the injection site, but disseminating throughout the body (in test animals, namely mice):
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3951851/posts
which linked to
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n958/rr-1
This is one such article on thrombosis as a side effect of the injections.
(But there are earlier articles which talk about clotting as a manifestation of the coof, even before vaccinations were being pushed):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378457/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We can say 'a' disease is present, but not which one. The PCR doesn't test for a Covid-19 virus, it tests for a strand of material found in other places such as fruit, animals, Coca Cola and Spanish water.
Once falsely 'diagnosed' with a test that has 90% false positives, then the patient is denied treatments (they may now be given antibody treatments but not at first) so the mortality rate is up.
I beleive many pneumonia cases were falsely diagnosed as Covid-19 and denied treatment. :(
But some pneumonia cases were diagnosed with both pneumonia and Covid-19 and those lucky souls were 'allowed' treatment for pneumonia and their 'Covid-19' declared 'resolved' on its own (making said patient a 'surivor' of our medical system).
The non-existent virus; and the implications (freerepublic.com)
That would be between you and your physician.
The MMR vax (which was not available when I was a child) currently has a two-dose regimen.
Polio was vaccinated out of existence in the vast majority of the world. So unless you’re planning on traveling to the backcountry of Afghanistan and Pakistan, you shouldn’t need to worry about polio.
Thank you for the info. As a retired news hound I more or less deduced the essentials - but did not know about the web site. Of course almost all web blog postings are anonymous and must be considered an individual view.
I did not see much on the thread that encouraged me about the involvement of VAERS. We will see. As I posted, I submitted my report.
I didn’t see any broken hips under COVID-19. Everything else is a match for vaccine related things such as death, spontaneous abortions and blood clots.
Actually, the post was not from an “anonymous person claiming to be a doctor claiming to have a story about a patient who has died.”
IM Doc
April 19, 2021 at 10:56 am
As I stated in the piece – it is very critical to remember that the purpose of the VAERS is not to be 100% accurate. It, however, can be used as an early warning sign that things are amiss. It has in the past been vital in previous vaccine issues – such as Gardasil and RSV.
There were basically 20 vaccine deaths for the influenza virus in the 2020 year. If you look back for the past dozen years or so – that is right in line – a few dozen reports each year. Other sources tell me that approximately 130,000,000 doses of influenza vaccine were given in the year 2020. This too is not accurate – but is basically in line with previous years – even a bit higher than usual – there was a huge push if you recall to vaccinate everyone with the flu shot – thinking it would be a co-morbidity with COVID.
So the flu shot ( a good control cohort for another respiratory virus vaccine ) had deaths of about 20 in a dosing cohort of 130,000,000 making that ratio – 1 death in 6.5 million vaccine doses.
It is difficult to know where to cut off the COVID vaccine – because it is an ongoing process – so as of today – the VAERS is up to date as of APRIL 2. As of that day – the best info I can find is that 179,000,000 doses of COVID vaccine had been given around that date. And as of that date in VAERS we have 2700 or so vaccine related death reports. That is 1 death in 66296 vaccine administrations.
The COVID ratio for reported deaths/vaccine administered to the 2020 flu shot season with reported deaths is right at 98.
That is a startling differential. It is certainly not 100% accurate – but it is a very severe variance from a normal well-known vaccine like the flu shot. As I have indicated in the piece – the system is way behind, who knows what all is being processed at this time.
The point of the VAERS system is not to be 100% accurate. It is to be an early warning system – and to guide clinicians with their own witnessed complications and side effects.
It should be obvious to all that we have a problem.
It is my contention – that if the powers that be would just be straight and level with the American people that yes there is a huge safety problem associated with this vaccine – and we are doing everything we can to help and get us through this – that they would be light years ahead of where they are now. But that is not what they are doing.
The point is – in times past – the media would be jumping all over this – it is a huge discrepancy. Instead, the media is taking every opportunity to bash the VAERS system. It is telling a concerning story that they cannot fit into the SAFE SAFE SAFE narrative – and instead of dealing with the problem, they are bashing what system we have left.
I am certain that a young reporter could make his/her life’s reputation with this story like Woodward & Bernstein – but they seem to be nowhere to be found.
So people like me have to report this confidentially. Sorry – I know it is not ideal. The owners of this blog know exactly who I am – and I have been straightforward with them from Day 1. I cannot at this time risk being identified – we live in a nasty cancel culture. Maybe one day I can let it all be known – but not today.
I find it so interesting – that people dismiss things from anonymous sources that do not fit into their narratives – but are willing to soak it all in with things like Russiagate.
We live in an amazing world.
IM Doc
April 19, 2021 at 11:48 am
You make another point that is important.
The numbers above are just actual DEATHS.
The number of morbid complications when compared to the flu shot is equally overwhelming if not more so – now numbering into the tens of thousands. And no – we are not just talking about fever and chills.
Please go read through the case reports for yourselves.
IM Doc
April 19, 2021 at 4:15 pm
You are correct in every way in my opinion.
I am not anti-vaccination –
However – I am very much attuned to people’s risk profiles. And we should be much more clear with people that this is not a “risk-free” endeavor.
Yves Smith
April 19, 2021 at 4:50 pm
I have verified that this doctor is a practicing MD. He has written previously for this site, notably a critique of the NEJM article on the Pfizer vaccine.
We had a follow on discussion that included comments from other experts:
He has also stated (as has one of the other medical experts we sometimes contact) that saying anything negative about the vaccines would likely lead to being fired. Outside of NYC, hardly any physicians that are actually doing medicine (as opposed to cosmetic treatments or “life extension”) are employed in large medical groups.
I have also heard accounts of complications first hand from two people who have taken the vaccine. Not readers in comments, but people I know personally. One they eventually abated, the second they haven’t yet.
Frankly I am offended that you would think we’d post something that was fabricated.
Yves Smith. Yves has been in and around finance for over 30 years as an investment banker, management consultant to financial institutions across a large range of wholesale banking and trading markets businesses, and a corporate finance advisor. She has also written for the New York Times, Aljazeera, the New Republic, Salon, the Conference Board Review, the Australian Financial Review and other financial publications. Her TV appearances include NBC News, CNBC, Fox Business, PBS, Bill Moyers, Real News Network, Democracy Now, Russia TV, ABC (Australia), Aljazeera, and BNN (Canada). This post more fully describes her roles on this website. You can follow her on Twitter at @yvessmith.
“As a retired news hound” you can read more here about (and even see the pictures of) the highly regarded source who “verified that this doctor is a practicing MD.”
If only the other information provided here were half as “verified”...:-)
I see our COVID propagandist is here. You claim COVID is dangerous and every death is from COVID but here you are claiming no death is from the vaccine.
“The COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States have all gone through Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials.”
You don’t know what that means. What is the timelines for each of those phases and how could they possibly have been performed in 9 months, Sunshine?
Three women cannot have a baby in 3 months.
“I know many elderly that tested positive but had no real effect at all, other than fear.”
During last summer, the reporters in the local Denver news stations and the homosexual governor Polis were claiming all long term care facilities had stacks of bodies. The wife runs 40 long term care facilities in Colorado. She had little COVID at all and very few deaths.
The government and the press lied and continue to lie about it all.
Once the vaccine started being administered, the elderly have been dying like crazy and the government is labeling the deaths as COVID but not vaccine related.
:^D You don't have to prove yourself to me. First, I noted the 'IM Doc' {internal medicine} which added credibility to your post. Second, I am long retired and can do little but encourage posting on FR to create an archive. I also do some archiving for history which I share from time to time on thumb drive to interested parties.
Some of FR archived material has proved truly historical. Your post is always here to be reviewed and studied. It sounds like this VAERS issue could become a point of contention.
Hang in there. :)
Hi ransomnote.
That’s not ALL they’ve been hiding.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00210-5
Note the source. According the anointed, the premier journal that ever was or ever could have been.
NYS has not allowed primary care providers to offer vaccinations.
Maybe this is part of the reason why.
Great post👍
I received mine.
The CDC says its investigating every received report to detect any patterns that should be investigated. I think I see a pattern here.....
From CDC VAERS Data Set Posted here: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3920760/posts?page=2647#2647
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.