Posted on 04/25/2021 8:08:42 PM PDT by ransomnote
The CDC is far behind in publishing reports of adverse events it receives. As of April 6, only 25% of actual reports of adverse events were available in VAERS. In the past month as rate of vaccination increased, the CDC drastically reduced the rate that it now publishes received reports. This means that there may be at minimum four times the number of strokes published in VAERS already reported to the CDC.
Even though the CDC is underreporting adverse events for Covid-19 'vaccines' by simply not publishing them, the remaining reports which are published already account 11% of all adverse events in (30+ years of) VAERS after just 4 months of 'vaccine's' administration.
The Covid-19 vaccines are the 2nd largest group of reports in VAERS with 86,891 PUBLISHED reports, and this constitutes a mere fraction of what CDC has actually received.
Before Covid-19 emerged in 2020, Harvard conducted a study in which it determined that less than 1% of actual adverse reactions following vaccination are ever reported to the CDC.
With accounts of drastic medical staff reductions and supposedly overwhelming numbers of Covid-19 cases to deal with, what are the chances that medical staff have time to report deaths to VAERS even if they wanted to?
Many deaths following vaccination, particularly in nursing homes, and being dismissed as Covid-19 deaths when there is no evidence to support it.
An impassioned CNA tending to the elderly made an impassioned plea for the public to wake up and realize the elderly are 'dropping like flies' in response to the vaccination. When many of his clients abruptly died following vaccination, his supervisor dismissed the deaths as the result of a 'super spreader' depiste offering zero evidence.
"Covid-19" and 'superspreader' are convenient, default excuses to dismiss the actual impacts the Covid 'vaccines' on the elderly. Statements by family or staff as to the vibrant quality of life enjoyed by the patient which ended abruptly when vaccinated are dismissed with words like, "He was old..." and "It was her time..."
A thread on FR details the many reasons why cause of death is often not investigated, despite all the 'rules' involved, and that such determinations are largely a bueurocrtaic decision.
A Covid Death? The Bureaucracy Decides (freerepublic.com)
With abrupt deaths dismissed as natural causes or 'too hard to tell' or 'not enough resources to find out,' how many of other patients just might be experiencing strokes following vaccination which are then attributed to age?
Here's a patient record of stroke in VAERS:
| 93 years old | 15-30 days after vaccination | 1204231-1 | Suffered from a stroke on 4/3/21 from a blood clot in his brain stem. Prior to vaccine he was healthy and 100% independent, still drove, did grocery shopping, yard work, etc. Now he cannot move his left side and was placed on hospice as he has lost his will to eat, drink, or live. |
The data set I pulled from VAERS included all records containing 'stroke in the event description. All records containing 'stroke' in the adverse event description are shown here (freerepublic.com).
Some instances wherein a physician typed 'stroke ruled out,' or other neutral reference, likely occurred but those records which I reviewed (approximately 200) did not have more than 2 examples of that notation.
Further, there are other medical terms for stroke which I did not include in my search so some records are missing there.
There are many examples like this in VAERS for all ages, but particularly among the elderly, in which the account goes something like, "He was fine until she got the vaccine...." or "She was active and when I left the room. she was working on her puzzles and I came back and she was gone..."
[Note: You may want to review the record of strokes reported following vaccination (Covid-19, VAERS) I posted to FR here. I believe you'll be struck, as I was, by the number of times you see that overall, onset is relatively soon after vaccination.]
Deaths and inujries from strokes in the vaccinated elderly are too rapidly ignored by the CDC and others. The CDC will swiftly declare cause of death 'Covid-19' based on supposition without testing, or with a positive Covid-19 within 60 days of death, but reported cases of abrupt stroke within days of vaccination are deemed impossible to determine and dismissed as irrelevent.
Why are there so many published reports of strokes for Covid-19 Vaccines in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System? Here are the top 5 vaccines with the most published stroke records in VAERS.
886 of the total number of 2254 of adverse event description 'stroke' reported to VAERS are for Covid-19 'vaccines' (approx 5 records are not classified by manufacturer). That's 39% of all published reports of strokes for all vaccines in the VAERS database.
How can Covid-19 vaccination records amass 39% of event records with 'stroke' in 4 months of administration, even though VAERS is not publishing most of the Covid-19 vax reports it has received?
I routinely report on total deaths in VAERS, but it's clear upon reading the records that the medical staff often do not know what happens to their patient after transferred or discharged from the ER or facility. The deaths published in VAERS are likely unreliable and underreported.
The CDC is no longer making much effort to publish reports receives for Covid-19, but about a month ago, it was publishing 25% of them.
So the current count of 867 'stroke' references multiplied by a factor of (at extreme minium) 4 would yield 3,468 'stroke' instances reported to the CDC. This number is really too small because the CDC curtailed reporting and so the factor is now greater than 4. But let's work with 3468 'stroke' references for now.
Remember, less than 1% of vaccination adverse events was reported to VAERS before Covid-19 impacted staffing and resources. This likely means facilities said to be understaffed and overwhelmed are making a fraction of previous effort to report to VAERS now.
But let's use 1% to calculate how many strokes are likely occuring following vaccination to calculate how many strokes may be occurring following vaccination which are never reported to VAERS.
This could indicate, via very modest estimates, that 346,800 strokes overall following Covid-19 vaccinations.
I'm not saying the vaccinations are medically responsible, because no investigation has begun to gather any evidence that strokes are an issue at all. Since Fauci and 8 others at NIAID own patents in the Moderna vaccine, I don't believe any investigation will ever occur.
I'm not saying my estimates are not without error. The degree to which the CDC has decided not to spend money to hire data entry persons to update VAERS has no doubt contributed to the weaknesses of this kind of estimate. If the IRS 'fell behind' to the degree the CDC has 'fallen behind', I do believe the IRS would spend money on data entry resources to catch up, if only to collect taxe funds.
The CDC is verbose in its promises that when records of adverse events are received and reviewed, all necessary medical oversight occurs to determine if the events recorded have any bearing on the safety of the vaccine.
WHERE the CDC when it comes to strokes? Even f they disagree with my math, Covid-19 'vaccines' account for 39% of stroke records published in VAERS. The CDC knows its database is not up to date, and that many never report to VAERS.
I know. I know. I've been told many times that all untimely deaths are reported to VAERS or investigated (autopsy) by law, but it was not happening before, and it certainly isn't happening now (links above).
Personally I think my estimate of potentially 350,000 strokes occurring after Covid-19 vaccinations is both modest and defensible, given the circumstances. This estimate is meant to encompasses published, unpublished and unreported strokes following Covid-19 vaccination (e.g., 'he was old...'). Note that the CDC and others estimate that less than 800,000 strokes occur annually in the U.S.
How many would it take before the CDC takes an interest in finding out why published Covid vaccine adverse event reccords account for 36% of all strokes in VAER for all vaccines? Is the CDC interested in knowing that over 10% of all adverse event records (all symptoms) in VAERS are for Covid-19 vaccinations, or is that why the CDC curtailed publishing received reports in VAERS?
Forget the estimates and percentages. Is the existance of over 800 records with 'stroke' listed in the adverse events description getting ANY attention?
With no displayed interest in the records of strokes in VAERS for Covid-19 vaccines, I have little hope anyone will take an interest in the 747 records of anaphylaxis or any other significant injury. I suppose they don't want to contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy."
Freepers, quit making excuses and man up. Get your shots!
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
Yep, you too can get a stroke. Hurry up!
https://gab.com/Robert55/posts/106124367834051996
Very short news clip of a Freudian slip of the shot.
“Freepers, quit making excuses and man up. Get your shots!”
Stop telling people what to do.
Yup, the fact that the VAERS is NOT VERIFIED makes those who quote it the blind who will not see. SHOW me the piles of bodies and stroked out patients of the 200,000,000 who have been vaccinated.
Please
I beg you
Bless your heart.
In the wise and profound words of George Castanza: “Please make it stop!”
I’m in the hospital as I type with my second stroke in 5 years
No shot, but damsure won’t be getting the vaccine now
Great site I posted the link to earlier today. Make sure you read it when you get the chance.
The IM physician gives an inside look as to what is really going on today.
In early January of this year, in my own patients, I began to notice in COVID vaccinated patients a small number who were having significant complications from various blood clotting issues. These were very strange things that do not happen in the normal practice of medicine. I emailed Yves and Lambert back then that I was becoming a bit concerned that this was happening.
As has been my usual practice when there is a problem like this, I began following the VAERS system very carefully. And to my great concern, I saw a very large number of cases of death and complications similar to what I was seeing. The ratio of complications was quite startling – 100-200 times or so more than the control group of 2020 flu vaccines. The VAERS system is currently reporting over 3000 deaths related to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. The numbers in the European registries are almost exactly in line with this as well. I would guess from a simple perusal that about half these reports – both death and morbidity – are directly related to blood clotting issues.
VAERS was never a system meant to be perfectly accurate – but having a 100-200X difference in mortality rates should be attention-getting to everyone in medicine. And yet instead of addressing this issue head-on, our medical leaders continued right on with the party line that EVERYTHING IS SAFE and GOING SWIMMINGLY – nothing to see here. There were days that I felt like I was living in The Twilight Zone.
Both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are based on experimental mRNA technology. I discussed this coincidence with my PCP, who said that I was over analyzing. Perhaps, but I filed a report with VAERS, emphasizing that it was preliminary and as yet medically unsupported but that I wished to get the case on file in case there were other similar reports.
I see my hematologist Wednesday and I will see what he has to say. I told a friend today that I wonder if the govt is competent to handle these type of reports. This story does not fill me with confidence but we will see. My friend has also experienced fatigue after receiving the vaccination series and I urged them to get blood tests for iron, especially ferritin.
If other vaccinated people read this posting and have experienced fatigue I suggest they get tested for iron. This mRNA technology is admittedly experimental and such record keeping could prove important.
The evil evil empire. Rolls on !
These fools want to INJECT YOU. think about that
Hope you are joking
Stop telling people what to do.
And, stop spamming threads, with the same absurd statement, over and over, Rex.
Look at his posting history.
Maybe spamming threads with that drivel is a joke, to him 🤷♀️
About 138 million people already vaccinated in the USA (4/25/21)(highly weighted towards the oldest people)(about 42% of US population)...an average of 7,000 people die in the USA per day so about 2,900 people per day will “die after vaccination”.
VAERS will have a hard time keeping up with that volume if all “they died after getting the vaccine” events are reported...not to mention all the “they got/had a (fill in the blank) after getting the COVID vaccine”.
I’m scheduled for my 2nd dose of Moderna on Tuesday. First shot gave me a day of fever and a miserable headache, which are are considered “adverse events”. But I made the judgement that the jab was better than the ‘Rona at my age. Other people will make different decisions, which is fine with me.
Here’s the irony part though: I wasn’t expecting any side effects from the first shot, so called the doc. She speculates that because I had a relatively strong reaction, that I had probably already contracted a mild case of the Rona sometime in the past 6 months. So maybe took the jab for nothing. That’s life; you pays you money and you takes you chances.
My prediction is that this mRNA technology is going to make a huge positive impact on human health and well being over the next 10 years though, and not just with the China virus.
Rest up. Get well. God Bless you.
I hope this is sarcasm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.