“Fraud vitiates everything.” That enduring opinion was the crux of the landmark decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the above referenced case of the United States versus Throckmorton. Ipso facto, the outcome of a POTUS election that is rife with one-sided fraud and criminality is rendered null and void.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61 (1878) United States v. Throckmorton 1.
...
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/98/61/
https://www.lawfareblog.com/whats-executive-order-election-interference
On Sept. 12, President Trump signed Executive Order 13848, titled “Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.” Reporting in early August suggested that such an order was being drafted, though—as will be discussed below—it appears to have changed in some meaningful ways.
The document opens by finding that foreign persons’ “ability … to interfere in or undermine public confidence in [U.S.] elections … constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the [U.S.],” thus triggering the president’s authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), codified at 50 U.S.C. §1701. (For additional background on IEEPA in the sanctions context, see here. For additional background on IEEPA more generally, including surveys of past uses, see here, here and here).
HOW MANY US CITIZENS engaged in this?
[T]he term “foreign interference,” with respect to an election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes or institutions …
******************************
***********************************
STARLIT- I’ll finish with this...are the UV lights being used in AZ for making sure ALL ballots are legal? Such as possibly only those that have the watermark WILL BE COUNTED!!! (hoosiermama worked the election here in IN and it was the first time in her 30 to see watermarks. Secretary signs him name with his name printed and his office title. This time they had a muliti-toned watermake...in the area.) She and others examined it with a magnifying glass glass because it was NEW to all who was working there.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/98/61
https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914ab52add7b04934732db1
https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep098061/
Praying this is so, and...all tied together....to fully expose the lying, cheating cabal.
Great to see your post!