Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SecAmndmt

Please show me where in the constitution the word health appears.

Look I respect your opinion and I agree it a difficult subject. And you are right no employer has the right to tell you what to do. But on the same page no employee as a right to employment. So this is why I err on this. If an employee can force his will on the employer then the employer has not fundamental rights to control his business fhat he has a personal investment in

The protection of at will is based entirely in freedom. I would prefer to leave it there without government interference. There are a lot of people who won’t require a vaccine.


120 posted on 04/25/2021 1:48:02 PM PDT by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: gas_dr
This is why you're wrong.

If the employer requires you to get the jab, they are necessarily infringing on your bodily integrity. They are MAKING you take an untested, experimental gene therapy into your body.

Yes, it's a gene therapy, according to the FDA. Moderna itself says so explicitly in its SEC filing (Wall Street).

If your right to integrity over your own body is paramount, you are subjecting the employer, indirectly, to an unknown risk (that of transmission of a virus with an overall fatality rate of < 1%, and even that concentrated among people over 70...almost all of whom are *out of the workforce*); further, there is no guarantee that even if you have the virus, you will spread it.

Further, the two risks are *disproportionate*: if you get the jab and have severe sequelae, you're stuck with them: you can't get onto CareerBuilder.com or Indeed.com and find a new, say, circulatory system. Whereas in the worst case scenario, the employer is subject to *inconvenience*: he'll have to hire a replacement for Jack who's off work. He doesn't lose the entire business.

Further, it is likely the business can purchase a policy to help bear the costs to replace sick employees. But the individual has no such recourse against manufacturers of the jab, if they cozen the government into calling it a "vaccination."

130 posted on 04/25/2021 2:47:05 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

See the 9th amendment. See the 10th amendment.

Try the Declaration of Independence.

Try the Common Law.

At the federal level, there is zero authority over health care (see Art 1 Sect 8)

You don’t believe in health freedom? Then you really are a national socialist.

PS. The Declaration recognizes God-given rights. We don’t need permission, and we don’t need a bunch of judges to give permission.


131 posted on 04/25/2021 3:14:45 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Aim small, miss small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: gas_dr

“. If an employee can force his will on the employer then the employer has not fundamental rights to control his business fhat he has a personal investment in”

You really twist that around.

Me going about my daily life, my bodily integrity, my immune system are none of my employer’s business. And insisting that it be my business and mine alone, is not forcing my employer to do anything. I have never known a business which claimed the part of the business was to inject its employees.

I will agree that I do not have the right to carry a gun in my employer’s office (without permission), proselytize, or otherwise do anything which is not part of my work.


132 posted on 04/25/2021 3:20:56 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Aim small, miss small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson