Posted on 04/24/2021 12:45:13 PM PDT by ransomnote
Wait.
The most cultlike zealots are zealots against blogs.
The cash is rolling in for ModeRNA now.
Many individuals are advocating for government mandates and also for severe restrictions that amount to coercion.
Find a happier home.
Arcadian Empire Since May 4, 2020 |
|
- and way better than you in every possible way for a whole lot longer than that -
Sure you are, junior.
LOL.....no kidding!
That’s why I said I was outta there. Scary place 😂
If the employer requires you to get the jab, they are necessarily infringing on your bodily integrity. They are MAKING you take an untested, experimental gene therapy into your body.
Yes, it's a gene therapy, according to the FDA. Moderna itself says so explicitly in its SEC filing (Wall Street).
If your right to integrity over your own body is paramount, you are subjecting the employer, indirectly, to an unknown risk (that of transmission of a virus with an overall fatality rate of < 1%, and even that concentrated among people over 70...almost all of whom are *out of the workforce*); further, there is no guarantee that even if you have the virus, you will spread it.
Further, the two risks are *disproportionate*: if you get the jab and have severe sequelae, you're stuck with them: you can't get onto CareerBuilder.com or Indeed.com and find a new, say, circulatory system. Whereas in the worst case scenario, the employer is subject to *inconvenience*: he'll have to hire a replacement for Jack who's off work. He doesn't lose the entire business.
Further, it is likely the business can purchase a policy to help bear the costs to replace sick employees. But the individual has no such recourse against manufacturers of the jab, if they cozen the government into calling it a "vaccination."
See the 9th amendment. See the 10th amendment.
Try the Declaration of Independence.
Try the Common Law.
At the federal level, there is zero authority over health care (see Art 1 Sect 8)
You don’t believe in health freedom? Then you really are a national socialist.
PS. The Declaration recognizes God-given rights. We don’t need permission, and we don’t need a bunch of judges to give permission.
“. If an employee can force his will on the employer then the employer has not fundamental rights to control his business fhat he has a personal investment in”
You really twist that around.
Me going about my daily life, my bodily integrity, my immune system are none of my employer’s business. And insisting that it be my business and mine alone, is not forcing my employer to do anything. I have never known a business which claimed the part of the business was to inject its employees.
I will agree that I do not have the right to carry a gun in my employer’s office (without permission), proselytize, or otherwise do anything which is not part of my work.
Dare we speak on this? LOL
I’m opposed to employers forced or control of employees lives not related to work. I’ve seen bad things happen when employers over step the work/home life bounds.
However, in a public health situation it is going to make a huge difference what the employee’s job is.
Would you want a nurse with Active T.B. in an exam room taking your blood pressure for a routine doctor visit?
The nurse, by the way, under terms of employment must summit to a T.B. test but it’s her body and her choice? So she says no.
It might be ok for an auto mechanic to have Covid-19, or T.B., hepatitis A,B,or C.........but the guy or gal making your pizza, no that’s not ok. Or is it?
Job description matters in this situation.
Also, why should the employer be on the hook to pay an insurance premium? They’ll simple find someone willing to do the job under their terms.
2 years ago the Metro Detroit area had a Hep-A outbreak.
The infected where being traced to area restaurants.
How should that be handled? Shut down the restaurant? Require the employee to get vaccinated? Or go broke and lose the business due to lawsuits?
Factory workers were not being traced for spreading Hep-A.
So the type of job I think matters.
The coof is not nearly as bad as that. Remember, they have to put a giant Q-tip all the way up almost to your brain, to get any sample, but a single invisible droplet is infectious six feet away.
My ass, Bob.
And Faux-Xi and the others admit the jab is not efficacious: after the jab, you must STILL wear masks AND social distance AND get a new jab every 6 months.
Nice try, troll-boi.
Good grief.
I’m not even sure if you replied or what! 😂🤣
Ummmm ok. Whatever. That’s your reply.
Let the record reflect “Giant Q-Tip”, “Bob”, “Fauci-Xi” and of course “Troll”.
I got the first Moderna shot. No mutations yet.
I just got my second Moderna shot yesterday. So far, so goosdffsdffaoifgjdfi;lgjo;dierubp ewoiufsa;djcv
Wow, you mean you can't give a sample just by sneezing on something? (what are those stupid masks for)
Brings to mind a high school science ezperiment where we were supposed to sneeze on a Petri dish and then examine the stuff that grew there as a result.
😂...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.