To: ShadowAce
To me this is upside down. Why take a great OS like Linux and force it to be run underneath Windows. What would be wrong with Windows running underneath Linux?
9 posted on
04/23/2021 12:54:20 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Corporations don’t pay taxes. They collect them. From us. ~ h/t Little Ray)
To: upchuck
Or better yet, Windows apps running natively on Linux (Visio, MS Project)
10 posted on
04/23/2021 1:34:36 PM PDT by
taxcontrol
(You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.)
To: upchuck
Yup. Duel booting is preferable for computers with average or better CPUs as Linux has multiple configurations designed for low demands. Did one myself after reading people’s problems with that - just a matter of resetting the boot sequence. But I’m an idiot.
14 posted on
04/23/2021 1:48:09 PM PDT by
MikelTackNailer
(First Rule of Fraud Club is punish any talk about Fraud Club.)
To: upchuck
I’ll answer that... NOTHING. They are trying to steal it and claim it their own as proprietary. It has already been predicted that MS would try this if we let them try to integrate or support anything Linux period. Soon it will be “well from what I understand, you cannot use Linux unless you have windows to run it?”.
Watch, here it comes...
18 posted on
04/23/2021 2:23:01 PM PDT by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: upchuck
To me this is upside down. Why take a great OS like Linux and force it to be run underneath Windows. What would be wrong with Windows running underneath Linux?The proper way to run windows is as a VM under Linux.
29 posted on
04/24/2021 8:04:01 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson