To: AnglePark
I’ve been sitting here the last few weeks wondering how, after 14+ months with this “highly contagious” China virus running “rampant,” only 7.5% of my state’s population have been afflicted. Did your state mandate masks and social distancing? Were certain venues, such as restaurants, shut down or restricted as to numbers of occupants?
Those measures to inhibit spread of virus actually work. They are why, even though it is very contagious, the number of affected people has been kept down.
14 posted on
04/23/2021 9:57:14 AM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
To: exDemMom
If so, why do states that didn’t lock down or locked down very little have lower infection rates than some that did?
15 posted on
04/23/2021 9:59:53 AM PDT by
Persevero
(I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen )
To: exDemMom
Explain Florida and Texas.
To: exDemMom
Those measures to inhibit spread of virus actually work. They are why, even though it is very contagious, the number of affected people has been kept down. Which is why lockdown states have fewer new cases than states like Texas.
Sod off, Gretchen.
30 posted on
04/27/2021 5:20:57 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson