Posted on 04/22/2021 8:19:18 AM PDT by Cathi
Friends and family are doing that to me too. It’s like I might die if I don’t or be responsible for another spike, even though I had it.
I just start asking my repertoire of questions. Sometimes they’ll say, “maybe I shouldn’t have gotten the vaccine.”
In just my circle, several people have gotten really sick and one guy got a serious autoimmune reaction.
“I don’t disagree but I have a 19 year old desperate to get back to normal. A shot so he can attend school, go to a baseball game or concert...I’m struggling hard here trying to educate him. He is just a kid who wants to be a kid.”
Seems a high price to pay just to see a concert or baseball game.
All the best to you and yours
Very unlikely you die from covid. Especially if you treat it.
I find the low death rate remarkable as covid in Murica is not readily treated until patients are in crisis. My MIL was untreated until she couldn’t breath the 2nd week and was brought into the hospital, where she was given O2 until she passed. Anyway, You would expect people with COPD to drop like flies with their comorbidity factor.
Nope. That isn’t happening according to CDC statistics comparing 2019 to 2020. In fact no any of the co morbidity death rates that the CDC tracks have not increased materially YoY. What has increased? Unknowns. Going back 4 moths to be specific.
Read what you want into this, but understand this is CDC data and their cause of death categories. Numbers are not racist, or political until they are interpreted for public consumption. I suspect this data that Denninger used will not be captured in future years.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242128
Mr. Denninger isn’t a Dr..... but he certainly can crunch data.
Whats that from? The Vaccine?
What do you consider a "very, very small chance"?
As of this morning, the death rate from Covid-19 in the US is 1.787%. A total of 569,404 (US) people had died from it; for comparison, in 2019, heart disease killed 659,041 and cancer killed 599,601. Influenza, another disease that governments all over the world consider deadly enough to spend billions in research to fight, killed 49,783 in 2019. From a public health perspective, something that kills nearly 2% of its victims and leaves at least a third of survivors with serious long-term disabilities, is a really big deal.
Yes, he couldn’t walk or eat. “Inciting factor likely HSV (Herpes) +/- in the setting of recent covid vaccination.”
It inserts messenger RNA into cells and programs them to produce spike protein for a little while. Messenger RNAs typically have a half life of a few hours in the cell before the cell breaks them up into nucleotides and either reuses them or discards them as waste to be filtered out by the kidneys. The RNA does not have any effect on cell DNA, so it does not have long-term effects.
No, you’re being closed minded by completely ignoring the fact that the vast majority of people have a very, very small chance of dying from COVID19. And many, like me, aren’t “anti-vaxxers”. We’re just leery of experimental “vaccines” that may, immediately or in time, pose far greater risks than COVID19.
.........................................
Nicely done!
I think it was a joke. The comments here are saying that the “rareness” of the side effects is poor consolation to those who suffer them.
Holy Smokes!
I need to amend my earlier post.
There were six reported cases of these CVST blood clots occurring after (now 8,018,365) J&J vaccinations in women, but this case was the only fatality.
Changing tagline
yeah, except the method used to ascertain the number of COVID19 deaths are BS. Plus the 1.78% rate you quote is ridiculous. Divide 569,404 (deaths) by 330,000,000 (US population). The death rate is 0.00172%.
I don’t necessarily disagree, I’m merely calling it as I see it. There is a ton of money in these vaccines of course, and our corporatist government will do what it needs to to ensure their paymasters are satiated.
Thanks for a clear explanation.
It is more accurate to derive the mortality rates from the total numbers who have actually caught the disease and have survived PLUS those who have died from it...not derived from the number of covid dead as a fractional percentage of the general populations that has a mix of those who never caught the disease plus those who have caught it plus those who are being born daily plus those who are dying from other causes daily.
Your way gives no meaningful information as to a person’s chances of survival if they should actually GET the disease!
Lol, by your own argument one can only conclude in order to for the 1.78% death to be accurate that very few people actually GET the disease.
Death rates are calculated on the basis of the number of cases, not the size of the population.
By your method, there is no need, ever, to get prophylactic treatment if you are bitten by a rabid animal. That’s because only 1 or 2 people die of rabies in the US every year, so only 0.0000003% of the population dies from rabies. However, the death rate of rabies is 100% (not counting the few survivors who received extraordinary treatments), because every person who exhibits symptoms of rabies dies.
For Covid-19, 569404 deaths/31862987 cases (x 100 to make it a percent) comes out to 1.787%. That’s really high for a disease that is spread through the respiratory route.
Data in VAERS (4/19/2021) for "cereberalvascular accidents"
Pfizer (49)
Moderna (40)
Johnson & Johnson (7).
Note that a Harvard study determined that only about 1% of actual negative events following vaccination are ever enterred into VAERS, and at present, the CDC has not yet enterred more than 75% of the reports it has received into the database.
Combine that with the totals for other kinds of terminology for these clotting events, the numbers above are really just a drop in the bucket for what's actually going on.
Below, comments on research about a study on Astrazeneca vaccine and blood clots which I'll add for reference, but here's the relevant excerpt:
Reference article:
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination
List of authors.
April 9, 2021
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104840
Pasted from <https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104840?query=recirc_mostViewed_railB_article>
ransomnote:
The researchers describe the blood-clotting issue seen in several post vaccination cases for Astrazeneca as being similar to clotting that also occurs in some as a result of exposure to heparin. The onset for this reaction post vaccination is approximately 1 to 2 weeks.
A case study (49 year old health care worker) in their research had minor symptoms common to many I've read in the first 3 days following vaccination (fatigue, myalgia, and headache). Beginning on day 5, she had chills, fever, nausea, and epigastric discomfort; and was admitted to a local hospital on day 10.
As a result of their work, the researchers suggest providing non-heparin anti-coagulant to vaccination patients experiencing clotting, unless the patient has already been screened for adverse reaction to heparin in advance. I think this is an important finding because witnessing stroke-like symptoms in the ER likely results in the administration of Heparin, which for some may compound the clotting.
While their work was conducted only on Astrazeneca, I've read many accounts for Pfizer/Moderna of doctors grappling with 'stroke-like' symptoms in which clots may not be be found (a detail described in the linked research), clots, or evidence of 'cerebralvasdcular accidents.'
Data in VAERS today for "cereberalvascular accidents" Pfizer (49) and Moderna (40) and Johnson & Johnson (7). There are other terms used in the database to indicate clotting and thickening in the blood that doesn't necessary last but can cause things like brain damage during the time it's present, or which results in death.
Two quotes from their conclusions:
"Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 can result in the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against PF4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. (Funded by the German Research Foundation.)"
SNIP
"Finally, we suggest naming this novel entity vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) to avoid confusion with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia."
Yeah, whatever, believe what you want to believe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.