Posted on 04/17/2021 1:55:50 PM PDT by Cathi
Norway case study: All five developed thrombocytopenia. Four out of the five developed cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (the fifth had clotting in veins at the base of the skull and in the abdomen instead). Three out of the five died.
...four people out of 132,000 who received the Astra-Zeneca vaccine developed the normally exceedingly rare combination of thrombocytopenia with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. All had received the Astra-Zeneca vaccine seven to ten days earlier.
The second case series comes from Germany. It concerns eleven patients, aged from 22 to 49 years, who became ill between five and 16 days after receiving the Astra-Zeneca vaccine. Like in the Norwegian case series, all of the patients had thrombocytopenia, and at least nine of the eleven had cerebral venous thrombosis. Six of the patients died.
...it is extremely uncommon for a patient to develop heparin induced thrombocytopenia in combination with a cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. In fact, it’s so uncommon that only a handful of cases have been reported in the entire medical literature. Up to now, that is.
None of the Norwegian or German patients had received heparin.
Here we have a constellation of signs and symptoms that is so uncommon that it’s previously only been described a handful of times in the medical literature, occurring again and again after a very specific exposure.
(Excerpt) Read more at sebastianrushworth.com ...
I think this refers to the power of a prospective (and placebo-controlled) study where study data is recorded meticulously and adverse events are chased down for tons of details. Such study data are considered non-biased and qualified for extensive statistical analyses and causality assessments.
Adverse events reported during non-study (therapeutic) are not bias-controlled and are analyzed differently.
“Risks can be calculated”
Yes, but you need time to identify the cases in order to make that calculation. They have just begun to do so but already the “1 in a million” is passe...:-)
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/92022
As of April 4, 169 cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and 53 cases of splanchnic vein (which drains blood from the digestive system) thrombosis have been reported in the European drug safety database. About 34 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine have been administered in Europe and the U.K., according to Sabine Straus, chair of the EMA’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC), as quoted by science journalist Kai Kupferschmidt in a tweet from an EMA press briefing.
The reported rate “varies very much with how good the reporting system in a member state is and how good cases are being identified.... In Germany, a lot of work has been done and I think there is a reporting rate of 1 in 100,000,” Straus said at the briefing, according to Kupferschmidt.
The MHRA statement put the overall risk of these types of clots at about 4 per million recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine. The agency said it had received 79 reports of blood clots with low platelets among 20.2 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine in the U.K., as of March 31. Of these, 44 were CVST and 35 were thromboses in major veins. These events occurred among 51 women and 28 men ages 18 to 79 years, among whom 19 died (13 women, 6 men). Of those who died, 11 were under age 50, and three were under 30. Fourteen had CVST with thrombocytopenia and five had thrombosis with thrombocytopenia.
n its statement, the EMA says that the PRAC reviewed 62 cases of CVST and 24 cases of thrombosis in the splanchnic vein reported in EudraVigilance (the European drug safety database), as of March 22. Most cases were in women under age 60 years, and most occurred within two weeks of the first dose of the vaccine. Eighteen people died.
But....you'll be denying science and killing someone's grandma if you don't...
“Adverse events reported during non-study (therapeutic) are not bias-controlled and are analyzed differently.”
Basically they are not analyzed individually at all. Which is how the CDC can assert that there is no evidence that any of the 3,005 after vaccine deaths were caused by a covid vaccine. The CDC in their own words looks “to detect signals.”
Their system is a disgrace and, unfortunately for them, leads to most people disregarding anything they say.
The 250,000+ “adverse events” and 3,005 after vax deaths are unprecedented and many magnitudes of any other vaccine program during VAERS almost 30 year history.
https://twitter.com/richzucker/status/1374030141618200577/photo/1
Safe and effective? Sorry, I would need a frontal lobotomy to agree with that..:-)
Well, I don’t want to kill their Grandma, so she should stay from me. 🤪
That age group should have chosen covid over the vaccine.
Agree. Amazing the number of YOUNG adults choosing to take this agent.
It seems that it was the FDA that called for the discontinuation of J+J vax use. The FDA has far more resources than CDC for this kind of analysis.
All adverse events reported to the FDA are included in boolean analysis such that when a rate exceeds some specified level it compels a formal review.
Causality assessment is very difficult with single dose therapeutics - 2 doses for the mRNA vaxs.
Effectiveness was measured in the pre-release clinical studies. Safety, as i mentioned, is a judgement call that some panel made and evidently they OKed the vaccines for distribution.
I am glad no one I know were on any of those panels.
“I am glad no one I know were on any of those panels.”
I wish one were because then you could ask him/her if they had expected this incredible amount of adverse effects from this. I would love to hear some bureaucrat defend this gigantic mistake.
I don’t know if you are aware of this but an EMA email lamenting that they were under pressure from the early (and they felt rushed by Azar) U.S. authorization of the vax was hacked and disclosed. The EU politicians ruled out the EMA’s desire to have time to thoroughly investigate Pfizer’s clinical trial results which had just been released days earlier.
The following link is to a video interview with a brave Canadian doctor about his experience with the roll out of Moderna vax. Depressing; but worth the time.
https://odysee.com/@DRutter:9/moderna-vaccine-wreaks-havoc-on-lytton:7
This link is a phone video by two men waiting in the vaccine car line who see one guy having a seizure just after his shot and then in another car next to theirs the guy is unconscious and the staff is working on him. The reaction of the two men in the waiting line was priceless...:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.