Replies

Will there ever be a vaccine or therapeutic that satisfies the anti science folks? First the vaccine. Nope. Never going to take it. Bill gates. Microchips. Gene therapy. Blah blah blah. All hysteria mind you. But fine. Don’t get the vaccine. Now a highly promising drug that treats the disease and you dismiss it as poison out of hand? I guess toj just want everyone to get covid and don’t care if people get chronic illness or die so you can advance your flat earth anti medicine agenda

It gets tiresome. Fast.

“Anti science”

Ha!

...and all the science that shows the dangers of being a lab rat in this nightmare? And the science that shows that NOBODY EVER has yet to create a successful corona virus vaccine?. I guess that’s not “real science” though.

...I get my vaccine daily...I eat healthy, take supplements that actually ARE tested and approved (you know, the ones where humans aren’t the real life lab rats until 2023), don’t wear a lemming face diaper, get sunshine and exercise.

It’s my daily dose of not poison.

I’ll wait until I see what happens to big pharma’s lab rats and see what their poison does to them first, before I ever volunteer to be part of their trials. It just make sense.

My dad used to say; “fools rush in where angels fear to tread”
.
...and something about no old bold pilots. I always loved to remind him about Chuck Yeager. He’d get mad =o)

“Will there ever be a vaccine or therapeutic that satisfies the anti science folks? First the vaccine. Nope.”

Just when we appear to see green shoots of honesty from you, you post this.

FLCCC’s MATH+ hospital protocol, and their early/home treatment protocols, both of which combine conventional and nutritional approaches, would be examples of effective therapeutics which many of us support.

Then there are the (IIRC) two dozen or so therapeutics mentioned by Dr Peter McCullough MD to the TX Senate in late March.

Then there are the pure/mostly supplement approaches used by wellness MDs. Some of them might might add HCQ and Ivermectin. My own MD recommends quercetin instead of HCQ. Dr David Brownstein has been using nebulized supplements for years.

Then there are Frontline Doctors, who most of the medical people here seem to despise.

Perhaps you have not been paying attention, but social media, the regular media, conventional medicine and government agencies have greatly restricted any mention/use of these therapeutics. Dr McCullough mentioned that it was done in tandem by all the above as soon as there was talk of a vax. Have you heard McCullough’s talk? It is eye opening. I guess he’s probably a quack.

BTW nice try in conflating the vaccines (2 of which are already in question/suspended?) and therapeutics.

We’re not flat earthers. We just prefer not to die of a blood disorder, a serious allergic reaction, cancer, or develop an appetite for brains, when the virus is close to 100% survivable by anyone with vitD blood levels above about 50 ng/mL plus daily zinc intake.

Come to think of it, a zombie would have to be on a crash diet to be enticed by some of our FR medical brains. But that is another discussion.

Now a highly promising drug that treats the disease and you dismiss it as poison out of hand?

Like HCQ or Ivwermectin?

Oh wait. They weren't allowed to be used because if there's a treatment that worked, then the vaccine isn't allowed to be used and there'd certainly be no need for EUA for an experimental medical treatment that has not been thoroughly tested for long term effects.

It's intellectual dishonestly to pretend that there are no other treatments for COVID but the so-called vaccine, when there were and are and they show promising results but were forbidden to be used.

I'd say it's pretty anti-science to not investigate EVERY possible treatment, especially those which are already know to be effective against other coronoa viruses.

Going for the most risky and invasive treatment first is beyond irresponsible. It's dispicable and evil.